Force of Destiny


2000+ Free world Best Books
click on the pics.


Logic Law


Four of the top sites in the world FREE

LATEST IN WATCH BBC TV.... POLICE COMPLAINT maladministration, Fraud, Criminal Conduct.
Get it cancelled.....Click
here...

City accused of issuing illegal parking tickets

The Force of Destiny

WORLD's Best Books Free 2000 +

Logic Law Number one site

21 22

10,000 Penalty Charge Notices NON compliant. DISAMBIGUATION HERE.

Neil Herron's Sites
ALL in one location, learn to defend yourself. READ THIS PAGE, STUDY, LEARN HERE FREE..........
LATEST IN WATCH BBC TV....
POLICE COMPLAINT
maladministration, Fraud, Criminal Conduct.

SEE MORE LARGER pictures of non compliant BAYS and LINES HERE

Free Parking in Camden, HERE.

10,000 Penalty Charge Notices NON compliant. DISAMBIGUATION HERE. Original article Evening Standard

23 24

10,000 Penalty Charge Notices NON compliant. DISAMBIGUATION HERE.

Free parking in Camden, but there's still barking for parking, and often a nasty bite if you don't know.....

c1

c2

More pictures

top

.....

Neil's Metric Martyrs site

.....

Neil's Daily Blog

.....

Neil Heron Parking Appeals

.....

Neil's The peoples no campaign

Click picture for YOUR victory.

.....

Neil's earlier European election

Truth
Unveiled
by Time.
Bernini
Truth around 1645

The exquisite sculpture of Bernini,
as an allegory of life today
by abuse of power, money
and strength.

The Rape of Proserpina.

Justice at the
Local Government
Ombudsman
(LGO) PATAS, and TEC
Blind & Off Balance, - Spin.

Local Government Ombudsman Watcher

Local Government Ombudsman Watch

Public Service Ombudsman Watchers








Metric Martyrs A win for Britain. Can Britain be saved from the slow decline towards totalitarianism, and authoritarianism?
People like Neil Herron and others are fighting hard. They need public support before we lose all to the forces of power, plunder and spin.
Local Authority scams for revenue are distorting truth and undermining the integrity of so called 'independent' quasi judicial bodies. Their independence is primarily based on the different building they work from and smart paperwork TELLING you they are independent, just like a person telling you 'To tell the truth....' then you should know immediately.
When you examine their composition, and funding you will find their design and purpose show the word spread by the councils to encourage you to go to a safe house – for THEM.

Press Release: Metric Martyrs Defence Fund: Immediate

Monumental victory for Metric Martyrs as the European Commission and the Government abandon enforced Metrication Programme"

...the pound, ounce, yard, foot, the mile and the pint have been saved!"

The European Commission’s Industry Commissioner Gunther Verheugen quietly announced in a meeting on 2nd May 2007 that "dual marking" of goods in imperial and metric will 'continue indefinitely'.


Following intense lobbying by the
Metric Martyrs Campaign and excellent work with US business by the British Weights and Measures Association, Commissioner Verheugen agreed that imperial measurements are 'good for business.'

The Metric Martyrs submission to the European Commission’s Metrication Consultation can be seen here

We do forgive Conservative MEP Giles Chichester for attempting to claim all the credit for what has undoubtedly been a team effort. The Conservative MEP's press release is copied below at the end of this release. I hope that he will join us with his Conservative colleagues to support the request for a Royal Pardon and a public acknowledgement of the Metric Martyrs' patriotic stand.

Papers also released under the Freedom of Information Act to the Metric Martyrs by the Department for Trade and Industry also indicate that the Government and the DtI have performed a screeching u- turn (quietly behind the scenes!) and abandoned plans to abolish imperial measures after 2009. The papers also reveal how concerned they were about the consequences of losing the case back in 2001.

This result represents a monumental victory for the Metric Martyrs who have campaigned tirelessly from their Sunderland office against enforced metrication since the two Sunderland traders, Steve Thoburn and Neil Herron, were first targeted by the authorities way back in 2000.

It is now apparent that the persecution of Steve Thoburn (and subsequently 4 other traders whose cases to the High Court were consolidated into the Thoburn appeal) was politically motivated but the resistance that their defiant stand created forced all the other local authorities to back off and they have been held at bay for 7 years.


Indeed, further information received from a
European Commission insider confirms this. He states:
"In fact, the Commission were never that interested in banning dual weight marking - the UK government "gold-plated" the directive and our zealous Trading Standards offices did the rest. But the acknowledgement of imperial measures may be linked to Monday's EU/US summit in Washinton, where both sides agreed to strive for a common transatlantic market, described as the biggest deregulation move in history. Trade is currently worth 2.25-trillion euros a year."

It must be remembered that Steve Thoburn always dual-priced and had metric scales.

The Metric Martyrs saw their convictions upheld at the Court of Appeal when Lord Justice Laws ( who hailed from Easington Lane not far from Sunderland and whose mother and sister bought bananas by the pound from Steve) delivered a 'bizarre constitutional' verdict that established the primacy of EU law.

Tragically, Steve died in his wife’s arms of a massive heart attack only days after learning that his appeal to the European Court of Human Rights had been rejected.

He had vowed to continue to defy the ‘law’ and continued serving his customersthe way they wanted to be served.’

Metric Martyrs Campaign Director, and former fishmonger, Neil Herron states:

This is a monumental victory for the Metric Martyrs and all who have supported the campaign. It has been ‘People Power’ that has forced the European Commission and the Government to abandon the enforced metrication programme.

We have saved the pint, the mile, the yard, the foot as well as pounds and ounces.

We have stood toe to toe with the Council, Government and the EU and won … and shown others that you can stop the tide of EU legislation.

Steve Thoburn was the man who drew the line in the sand.

All that remains now for the campaign is to insist on a Royal Pardon to quash the criminal conviction that Steve took with him to the grave.

He should never have been prosecuted and ALL the authorities knew that it should never have happened.

The public had never wanted or asked for imperial measures to be abolished and no political party had ever put it in their manifesto that they intended to criminalise the use of imperial measures.

The name of Steve Thoburn will be chiselled into the pages of the history books.

The day they seized his scales was the beginning of the end of the EU.”

ENDS

CONTACT:

Neil Herron

Campaign Director

Metric Martyrs Defence Fund

12 Frederick Street

Sunderland

SR1 1NA

Tel. 0191 565 7143 or 0191 514 4606

Mob. 07776 202045

SUPPORT THE DRIVE FOR STEVE'S ROYAL PARDON HERE

www.metricmartyrs.co.uk
e-mail:
metricmartyrs@btconnect.com

FURTHER INFORMATION:

The full background behind the European Commission, the Government and the DtI’s decision to surrender can be seen here

Below is MEP Giles Chichester's e-mail press release:

Release: Immediate
Date: 3rd May 2007
Issued by: Conservatives in the European Parliament
Giles Chichester MEP, tel: +32 (0) 2 28 45296
No more metric martyrs after Conservative lobbying pays off
End of EU inspired metrication after Commission agrees imperial measurements are good for business
Brussels, 3 May 2007 -- The threat to miles, yards and pints is off the agenda after Giles Chichester MEP, Conservative Industry Spokesman, got confirmation from Industry Commissioner Verheugen that "dual marking" of goods in imperial and metric will 'continue indefinitely'.
Following intense lobbying by the Conservatives, Commissioner Verheugen agreed that it was good news for British and European industry to keep imperial measurements as it would make it easier for them to sell to the United States.

Giles Chichester says: "After saving the crown on the British pint, I am happy the Conservatives have persuaded the Commission that it is good not only for international business but for the British people that traditional measurements are kept. I just hope there won't be any more need for metric martyrs and that the government will avoid forcing metrication down the public's throat."

Giles Chichester originally got a derogation from dual marking in the Units of Measurement Directive 1999. Commissioner Verheugen told the Industry, Research and Energy Committee on Wednesday 2nd May that he would bring forward a proposal to make the derogation permanent.

ENDS
For further information, please contact: Giles Chichester MEP, tel: +32 (0) 2 28 45296;
giles.chichester@europarl.europa.eu
Conservative Press Office: Peter Wilding - tel: + 32 (0) 2 2831138 or +32 (0) 473 861762;
peter.wilding@europarl.europa.eu







Look at these bays and lines, they are all non complaint.

top

21



22
top

23

24
top

25

26
top



10,000 parking fines 'are invalid because of rule changes'

THESE and signs / lines issues affect almost ALL borough COUNCILS.....

David Williams, Motoring Editor. Evening standard.

22.04.08

Thousands of parking tickets should be scrapped because they were issued under the "wrong" regulations, campaigners said today.

About 10,000 fines were handed out in Camden after new rules came into effect on 31 March. On that day, parking attendants became "civil enforcement officers" and councils had to pass new Traffic Management Orders to make their work legal, according to campaign group ParkingAppeals. Instead, it claims, Camden continued to issue penalties under the old legislation.

The group's founder, Neil Herron, says the council issued faulty tickets for 18 days for parking meter and pay and display "offences" - and that unenforceable tickets are still being issued for yellow line offences. He is threatening to take Camden to court unless it overturns the fines.

A spokesman for Camden council said: "We are confident we have acted lawfully. The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984. Therefore the changes brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing Traffic Management Orders."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23479671-details/10,000%20parking%20fines%20'are%20invalid%20because%20of%20rule%20changes'/article.do

Nice to print the allegation and PR replie without a rebuttal. Four comments were put to Evening standard NONE put forward.

HERE is the rebuttal and disambiguation to the council's PR crafting for public consumption.

How Camden HIDES TRUTH......in economic economic PR statements for gain.



Their spokesman and --- SPOKES. Emphasis added.

A spokesman for Camden council said: "We are confident we have acted lawfully. The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984. Therefore the changes brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing Traffic Management Orders."

Constructing what LOOKS like a syllogism, HOW to tell a seeming truth while HIDING a LIE.... Questions not answered or specified,

1."We are confident we have acted lawfully. ---- WHEN, during which period of relevancy? Note the choice of preterite tense. It may be that they have acted ... but it is not that they are acting during the relevant period of time.. ( suppresio veri suggesti falsi, law dictionary means Fraud see here, and the meaning of false representations in the fraud act, sections 1-4 even if it is misleading.)

2.The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984.----- SO WHAT? HAVE THEY EXERCISED that POWER LAWFULLY during the relevant period?

3.Therefore ..... (Based on TWO hypothetical premisses, undetermined as to TRUTH, we make a conclusion that MAY be true or false, BUT is irrelevant anyway..)

a)......................the changes brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing Traffic Management Orders." ( Which existing TMO's AND or TRO's? The ONE or TWO that MAY have been compliant, or the HUNDREDS that are NOT?..... They may still be still 'valid' in that they have been made correctly. However, they are not 'in force' because there are no powers to issue PCNs until the provision ie. under the 1991 Road Traffic Act ... is amended or varied to the TMA 2004 and Penalty Charge Notices issued by Parking Attendants is amended to PCNs issued by CEOs )

This is an amalgam of fallacies. First fallacy species of 'petitio principii', the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises; Namely the conclusion is based on an ASSUMPTION that is undetermined and IS the issue to be PROVED. THE TMA changes ARE MANDATORY.... Other internal fallacies, Fallacy species of 'ignoratio elenchi' ; ( presenting an argument that may in itself be valid, but doesn't address the issue in question) then choosing and using qualifiers that are irrelevant and ignoring ones that are. The Swapping out a relevant term(s) for an irrelevant one, We are NOT concerned with the validity of paperwork we are concerned with it's LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY. There are MANY more here. ONLY for the specialist. For the average reader this is probably already too much. This conscious swapping is 'mens rea' to the depostion in writing and is profiled by the agenda of target driven revenue in the newly so called, 'baseline performance indicators'. It is the art or economic and economic truth, heralded in when New labour called in advertising pr agencies to promote its policies in the abstract.

Logic Laws fallacies at Force of Destiny. Here and more on Camden's nice 'representations. Fallacies of independence click on top choices P1, P2 here.

Use Neil's site and get your appeal in. NOT to save just £50-60 but to Send a message to so called 'authorities' that they are COUNCILS, and public SERVANTS with a duty to act lawfully. Go to top, and click on parking appeal banners.

The period of concern is 31st March to 18th April 2008.

The legality of the Tro, and Tmo (Traffic Regulation / Management Orders ) is related to changes that have to be made to references that must refer to the TMA 2004, and NO LONGER to the RTA 1991.

If you make an appeal.

Go here, briefly look at pictures of Camden's NON compliant bay lines, then click to Neil Heron's Parking Appeal's website and subscribe for details of how to challenge the PCN. It would be remarkable of PATAS, to dismisses an appeal on grounds put in the way provided by parking appeals, and we shall all be watching over the shoulder at PATAS to observe what they do, and HOW they reason, just like Camden.

Suppressio veri suggestio falsi is Latin for suppression of the truth is the suggestion of falsehood. IT has manifest and remarkable aspect of FRAUD. Look below...

SUPPRESSIO VERI - Concealment of truth.

In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness.

Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution.

SUGGESTIO FALSI

SUGGESTIO FALSI. A statement of a falsehood. This amounts to a fraud whenever the party making it was bound to disclose the truth. (WHOLE TRUTH THAT IS) whenever the party making it was bound to disclose the truth. 2. The following is an example of a case where chancery will interfere 2. The following is an example of a case where chancery will interfere and. set aside a contract as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: and. set aside a contract as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: a purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild land, and a purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild land, and represented to him it was worth nothing, except for a sheep pasture, when he represented to him it was worth nothing, except for a sheep pasture, when he knew there was a valuable mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. knew there was a valuable mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. The sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837, et seq. Vide The sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837, et seq. Vide Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation; Suppressio veri. Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation; Suppressio veri.

http://www.law-dictionary.org/SUGGESTIO+FALSI.asp?q=SUGGESTIO+FALSI

SUPPRESSIO VERI

SUPPRESSIO VERI. Concealment of truth. 2. In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to 2. In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness. any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness. 1 Bla. Rep. 594; 3 Burr. 1809. 1 Bla. Rep. 594; 3 Burr. 1809. 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. 138; 1 Fonb. Eq. c. 2, s. 8; 1 Ball

http://www.law-dictionary.org/ld.asp?q=SUPPRESSIO+VERI

top

Click any picture below, and get hep to cancel your ticket....

nl3

nl4

nl5

top




City accused of issuing illegal parking tickets


Published Date:
24 April 2008



POLICE are investigating a complaint that Leeds Council issued thousands of technically illegal parking tickets when officials knew they had no authority to do so.

The West Yorkshire force has confirmed it has received a complaint which is now being examined. It was made by Neil Herron, 45, a self-styled motorists' champion who has been investigating Leeds Council's parking enforcement arrangements for 18 month

ADVERTISEMENT




He believes road markings and road signs are wrong and claims it would cost the authority up to £2m to correct the situation.

Mr Herron contacted police after unearthing a catalogue of official correspondence on email between the authority and the Government Office for Yorkshire and Humber.

Last night Mr Herron said: "Leeds had misrepresented the position to the Department of Transport, (DoT), in 2004 following the decriminalisation (of illegal parking).

"So they said to the DoT that it would be all right. In areas where signage was deficient there would be no enforcement but there were concerns at the time that the signs had not been updated.

"Anyone in an area which is unlawfully signed should be entitled not only to a refund but also making a claim against the council for obtaining monies for which they had no legal authority to do so and which they had no legal authority to do so and which they were aware that they had no authority to do so."

In an email, unearthed by Mr Heron using the Freedom of Information legislation, dated July 17, 2007, and passed to BBC Look North, Philip Heyes, regional signs officer for the Government Office For Yorkshire and Humber, wrote: "Overall the city centre is still in a pretty poor state, much of which is non-compliant. Some of the yellow disabled bays they corrected have now worn away and are now in an awful state...

"It certainly sounds like Leeds may not be following correct procedure where they are aware they should not be enforcing in the first place."

Richard Bentley, a former North Yorkshire Police officer and expert witness, said: "I think the situation in Leeds is dire and the motoring public is being sold short and I think officers of the authority are working beyond their powers. It's not the motorists who are behaving criminally it's Leeds."

A Leeds City Council spokeswoman said: "Leeds council is not trying to enforce parking restrictions in a manner which is in any way improper or illegal.

"Leeds is a big city and we know there are locations where the signs and lines do not exactly conform to the regulations.

"We are working to put this right and have a team of traffic engineers specifically working to address this issue.

"We have to comply to the letter of the law and we never knowingly issue a parking ticket where the lines or signs are incorrect. Parking attendants are specifically trained in this respect.

"Although we are not giving tickets where the lines and signs are incorrect, the intention of these restrictions is clear. Members of the public who intentionally take advantage of the knowledge that the restriction can't be legally enforced are spoiling it for those people that the restriction is intended to benefit."

A spokeswoman for Government Office, Yorkshire and the Humber, said: "The Department for Transport and Government Offices can only advise transport authorities to use the correct signage, but can't require them to do so.

"The recourse for the public is to complain to the Ombudsman about malpractice, or to the police."

A spokeswoman for West Yorkshire Police said: "We have received a complaint and are looking into it."


Extract from An email...


... Overall the City Centre is still in a pretty poor state, much of which is non-compliant.

Some of the yellow disabled bays they corrected have now been worn away and are now in an awful state of being partly white, partly yellow, and the disabled symbol that had been blacked out is now visible again...

...but it certainly sounds like Leeds may not be following correct procedure where they are aware they should not be enforcing in the first place...


T. Medusa,

london 24/04/2008 11:27:45


The way these council civil servants, wearing the badge of local authority UPSIDE DOWN, talk makes the gorge rise to listen..
When it comes to a contravention they and their backers NPAS, have only one thing to say, “the contravention occurred”, and when it comes to THEIR offences, they say see ONLY what's blurred.

They punish for TRIVIA, and TRIVIALISE their own offences that are totally ILLEGAL, not mere contraventions.

Just a comment that's all. On how authority
1.Hath yet a kind of medicine in itself That skins the vice o' th' top. Go to your bosom, Knock there, and ask your heart what it doth know That's like my brother's fault.

wayneo,

everywhere 24/04/2008 15:08:56

Why is Mr Herron 'self-styled'? I've never known him to 'stylr' himself as anyone but himself. Also, this sloppy journalist has left out one important component, that the Government department laid down the foundation stone for fraud, why has this not been included?



http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/City-accused-of-issuing-illegal.4014964.jp