|
|
2000+ Free world Best Books |
|
|
|
2000+ Free world Best Books |
|
NOTICE. A makeover is coming for this page, exposing the mendacity we are surrounded with, and more importantly HOW to deal with it. Where a court SHOULD “further the overriding objective of fairness” in their own rules CPR 1.1-1.4, they (and particularly all forms of less accountable tribunals) “OVERRIDE; the overriding objective of fairness.” Exposures are coming showing how this is managed and cloaked in spin and fallacies. Click here to see one of the commonest fallacies of 'irrelevant response', unambiguously. And HOW to close it down in about FIVE minutes, with ONE simple direct question” They do it so easily you don't even notice it. Simply by taking your issue; and like those on an ego trip on question time, go off on a trip with a close but DIFFERENT issue; that's self consistent but irrelevant, and you end up almost agreeing with them, leave completely confused and they just laugh behind you. The more sophisticated the body lying in front of you, the more it builds fallacies, overlying each other so heavily in irrelevant truths, that the contrariety or contradiction that was laying in front of you, now lies elsewhere. From this simple fallacy they argue others that are difficult to apprehend, but the best insight to it all, is your instinct. If that tells you something is wrong, then look for amalgams of fallacies. Here is an example from Camden, that didn't pass scrutiny, and they were caught at court.
Please SCROLL DOWN or click for top Next menu
|
Coming
soon, DIY to prepare for a Judical Review application, or County
Court claims. Using TEC to get an appeal to the CC all free...
GET you Parking Ticket Cancelled especially for Camden, and some
boroughs HERE. STOP PRESS 170 plus page
prepared arguments. Arguments for a court and Patas. |
|
The legality of the
tickets in Edinburgh first came into question in June as they
did not bear both |
|
A defend yourself section on Private Car Park penalties, very useful written by Pete |
|
DON'T MISS! John Doe's Statute of limitations, restitution, claims old paid parking tickets that fall under the Moses v Barnet Ruling. |
|
STOP PRESS! WHEN Paying PCN's the rule is that you are told afterwards “You consented!”.........CLICK here FALSE presumption. |
SPECIAL template letter PRIVATE Parking and BARKING “PAY”attempts, also Disabled Blue badge holders. Click Here.
|
Statutes, Rights, Court, Case Laws, Exposed |
HM Court Service, |
Literature, Law, Philosophy, Music |
Logic Law as used over 2000 years by the worlds great writers. |
2000 World Books Free |
Camden & Government Along with their media, under the microscope... |
|
Complaints & Abuses Exposed. Early portals |
Local Government Ombudsman, fallacious logic from the TOP exposed. With Transport for London. NEW In depth ANALYSIS. |
|
Literature Entire Works of Shakespeare Downloadable FREE by play or entire works |
The old Police Complaints Authority? Exposed. Amtrak Express parcels Ltd., Privity rule rebutted. |
...or rather a
telescope. A weekly look at the fast food
we are fed |
top
This
home, complaints, abuses and exposures.
CAMDEN
SPECIAL. They must surely be the leading misleading parking
solutions council in the UK.
Aristotle
on Injustice, see below. see
below.
PROVING....
The
Bill of Rights 1688 is still alive
today, see the Crown
remains involved here.
Look at all these three different
links.
Wayne's
pages.
2000
World Best Books Free
STOP
PRESS, must
be the worst scam in history Seeking £757.94 in courts, for a
contravention that did NOT occur, click
here.
........Downloads - Shakespeare's entire works in one zip file unzips into each play. Link next line up.
|
Camden focus, TEC Stat Dec, Camden accepts £395 revoked ARE you being framed with ring fenced legal arguments Template letter responses to rebut parking fines The Barnet V Moses COURT Transcript..... With focussed highlights. 56 Reasons for getting a PCN cancelled. The 56 DAY RULE, clamping and tow-aways, duty of response. Handling Bailiffs, deal with them BEFORE they visit, by fax, email and letter. High Court Victory for Motorists, get PCN cancelled on missing date of ISSUE on the PCN Template letter 53. BBC RADIO 4 Program informative discussion on the above THE FIRST FULL TEXT of that RULING... PCN's are a NULLITY 2 Good reasons through that wretched grounds for appeal on the NTO form that excludes everything legitimate and reasonable. A sample DRAFT CLAIM for the small claims court, with comments. Disabled badge notice for dashboard of your car. Off beat case won, that you should be aware of & remembered. Disabled, Vexed and bullied. Even if not disabled. Template letter.
Free advice get your £50 back, no costs from here. |
DON'T MISS! John Doe's Statute of limitations restitution, claims, old paid parking tickets that fall under Barrie Segal's Moses v Barnet Ruling. How YOU TOO can frame your case within a context of legal arguments. The power rebuttal theory The essential tenet. A tiny piece of Logic with the matrix truth table. SPECIAL FALLACIES PAGES – Identifying and dismantling deceit and abusive semantics by mendacious councils et al. New..Look at it! Clamping a vehicle without notices is trespass and illegal Defend yourself, know how! & points to watch. New. And how to compel the defendant into providing disclosure of what you know they are hiding by using the relevant CPR (Civil Procedure Rules).
The latest ALG statement affecting ALL MOTORISTS with OPEN PCN's Getting refunds, even after PCN's are paid, and at Enforcement stage with Bailiffs. A NEW SECTION OPENING UP, to be fed with more ideas. MOT scam with adjacent garage.. |
|
READ THIS FIRST. For a while all PCN's are generally invalid, is it worth your time to learn something that can be used for all the times in the future when you will get another ticket. Do it now! You are entitled to appeal any parking ticket immediately, WITHOUT losing the discount. By appealing, the council should always, and in my experience will in all cases re-instate the discount period on their response giving you another chance to take advantage of the discount. They use templates for responses, so no matter how much the letter looks personal, it's a standard reply. Therefore ALWAYS APPEAL, you may well get the PCN cancelled. You lose nothing by trying except a small amount of time. The letters are already prepared for you to simply copy and paste, just like they do. All free! A recent High Court ruling means that as of beginning of August 2006, and UNTIL the councils get their parking tickets re-worded, ALL or most councils in the UK are giving out PCN's that are invalid, illegal and unenforceable. Do you want to pay an invalid PCN. £50 -£100 that can be saved, for a few minutes of your time here. Once you know better, you will never just pay up for the asking again. The fine is a civil penalty, you cannot go to prison for not paying it, but the costs can mount if you don''t address the problem as early as possible. At every stage you can fight it. Even at the stage of enforcement with the courts, you are entitled to dispute it and request a proper hearing. |
READ THIS FIRST. Take the view that the PCN is at the total full face value (in London £100) at the outset and appeal it. The discount is set to focus your mind on paying and NOT questioning. If a parking ticket has gone beyond the stage of appeal, and you have not attended to a response of some kind, you almost deserve to be visited at greater expense. ALWAYS take the opportunity and FIND the time to rebut a court enforcement order the moment you see it, well before the unannounced visit from bailiffs. There are MANY ways enforcement can be turned around, payment terms agreed on, goods NOT distrained upon, but the car is difficult to protect, its traceable, and identifiable. You will find advice on how to do this here, over the coming weeks. If it takes place at the Northampton CC, then you can go there and download a form N244, or N245 (click Bailiffs) for a stay of warrant or proposal to pay. Other circumstance for handling bailiffs are also teated here, where goods are under threat of distraint. Don't postpone the inevitable, because it is NOT inevitable if you face it, and know how to ensure you are NOT taken advantage of illegally. Handling Bailiffs Goods NOT belonging to the person under enforcement MUST NOT BE TAKEN, ONLY goods belonging to the owner of the debt. Since distraint usually removes goods to a value some 5-6 times the original costs; bearing in mind you may have paid for them with interest as well, it is extremely shortsighted to allow it when other measure can be taken to prevent. Be alerted, forewarned and take steps to avoid beforehand. |
|
WHAT is more important than this comment by a Judge against CAMDEN Council, and its contrary being found in what is being done by them and nationwide? 6. Mr. Justice McCullough in his judgement Regina v Camden Borough Council ex parte Mark Dyson, Gordon Cram and Others[2] examines the policy and objects of the 1984 Act. The observes (at p23) “Doing this [viz looking at the objectives of the 1984 Act] makes clear that the 1984 Act is not a fiscal measure. It contains no provision which suggests that Parliament intended to authorise a council to raise income by using its powers to designate parking places on the highway and to charge for their use. To adapt words used by Nolan LJ in R v Manchester City Council ex p King (1991) 89 LGR 696 at 712, had this been the intention of Parliament to the extent of the fund-raising powers conferred on the council would be enormous, since they have a monopoly over the granting of permits for on-street parking within their area and would have golden opportunities to augment their revenue…(at p24). All its provisions, leaving aside section 55(4) for the moment, are concerned in one way or another with the expeditious, convenient and safe movement of traffic and the provision of suitable and adequate parking facilities on and off the highway. This is reflected in the wording of section 122(1). There is its policy; there are its objects”. McCullough observes (at p34) that “the fact that the 1984 Act is not a revenue raising Act. Where there is ambiguity the citizen is not to be taxed unless the language of the legislation clearly imposes the obligation”. |
|
And now a few COMMENTS! Sound bites Of the Day. Quote. OXFORD CC The figure was not a target or quota, Mr Dix added, And a Camden equi
vocater in the press recently said “The figures are NOT
targets”, they are “baseline performance indicators”,
and promptly changed that name when it had been realised that the
two expressions were dirrent SENSES of the same reference. To say that a thing is not is the guessing game of you try and find the sense I am using for thee SAME expression, namely “baseline performance indicators”, or a new term that keeps changing to be ahead of the SENSELESS game. Or as I have seen
recently from a fair and public hearing an OXFORD PCN case, where
it was claimed they had issued an; Now that's how to tell an economic truth that imp lies a falsity. Subtract the essential qualifying adjective UNLAWFUL, and then get away with truth that implies a falsity. Clever semantic children!
|
Note: The author and any contributors take NO responsibility for the use, misuse, or consequences that flow from using these examples. You are invited to consider the IDEAS, and use them on your own responsibility. Copyright is waived for these pages, use them advisedly, knowingly, understandingly and freely.
|
A sample letter for your first response to the receipt of a PCN. A similar one to this was used successfully with a tough council, and they showed some lenience and cancelled the PCN. It was from a financially weaker person. Sending this letter may give you between 3 and 5 weeks stay of action, and should give a further 2 week extension of discount for payment. |
|
|
A sample letter for any response to the receipt of a PCN or NTO. 53 reasons for the PCN to be cancelled, more to be added, add your own?
|
|
|
Paying the PCN, DOES NOT MEAN you consent. |
Two template letters,with a caveat in case there is a claim later. |
|
Private parking
companies PRIVATE PARKING COMPANIES
BLUE BADGE DISABLED DRIVERS. To help those who are disabled,
and need to look at the way their councils treat
them. PUBLIC AUTHORITIES |
|
|
First litigious |
|
|
Second Litigious Notice |
|
|
The velvet gauntlet. Formal notice without prejudice |
|
|
Courteous Pedantic Churl |
This is not yet formulated as a template, but is my own with Camden at the present stage |
|
This is formulated as a real working template of my own case. I shall be publishing as we go, all the mate4rial I shall rely on in court, so the readers can see clearly how this case has been built up, Their being treated reasonably, while to me, it has been relentless and without validity, -- to be proven - . |
|
|
The notice of intent and draft court claim |
|
|
The claim Proper and notice to issue |
|
|
The Adjudicator's hearing. |
|
|
Preparing the case |
|
|
The issued or Statutory Declaration, claim and exhibits. |
A sample letter for your Statutory Declaration response to the receipt of a Charge Notice or bailiff enforcement. This is a live example that has been accepted by Camden, the case is ongoing, but the debt of £395 has been revoked back to £50, as at 28th November 2006. ALL non compliant Penalty Charge Notices, “PCN's” and Notice to Owner “ NoR” pre dating August 1st are likely to fall into this category. On the NoR look for the words, pay by th date of this letter, MUST be the date of issue of this letter. Not much but SUFFICIENT........ In this case I believe the aprty never rceived a NoR anyway. This will be shown when I have all the papers. |
|
First appeal compassionate
Here is a sample first letter that tries to ask for clemency, where you have no or not much defence at all for the contravention, but have some mitigating circumstance. A similar letter was used and the council confirmed the contravention took place but showed leniency. It is the first letter of a number of escalating degrees in representation. When you receive the response. If your instinct tells you it feels unjust or grossly disproportional then the refusal will provide you with the justification and the vexation and determination to either settle it or defend it with increasing vigour. Call it the first appeal compassionate. The next shall be the reply courteous defending.
Myname & Surname Myaddress line 1 Myaddress line 2, Mypostcode My telephone & my fax.
Date of letter, should be asap after the pcn is given.
To the name of the Council. FAO the Parking Ticket department
Re: PCN, DT???????? VRN: B452 NOL
Dear Sir Madam,
I profoundly apologise if I have committed this alleged offence, which as you will see from the ticket, I had affixed to the windscreen and paid for in good faith. My return was unfortunately too late to remove the car before the time on the Meter elapsed. Or else I had accidentally parked in the wrongly designated area being unfamiliar with the road signage that for me was confusing, or else I misunderstood the sing, or did not see the loading unloading notice being somewhat high for me.. I was in the belief I had parked legally, and or my return too late was for a serious reason out of my control, namely I was held up on the train, it being late by twenty minutes, or there was a fire alert in the premises I was in, and while I left the building I had to return to collect my belongings or shopping. [You should state the truth, and be able to rely on something to corroborate what you say, if asked].
I am disabled, an old age pensioner or a tourist, or from another city on a brief visit to meet my family or go to the doctor, or hospital or similar..Paying this penalty, for me it is extremely difficult to pay this penalty, being disabled or a job seeker or currently on benefit assistance,, and the money will have to come either from next weeks food bill, or the car may have to be sold to pay the penalty. Don't say this if it a Mercedes,or Ferrari, again it all should be the truth, and the plea should be realistic and reliable.
May I please beg you to permit some leniency in this case, because as stated above, I did pay in good faith and confident I would return in time, or convinced I was parked correctly. May I add that I was not causing congestion, being on a side street, and parked properly. On my return I was in time to talk to the warden who said if I I write in, you may be kind enough to to treat this with some compassion as a genuine error of judgement.
Please advise me as soon as possible, so that I can make the necessary arrangements if needed for a loan or finance if you decide not to show leniency.
Yours with my most humble apologies, I will make every effort to be more careful next time.
Mr. / Mrs A. Pedant.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Camden focus, TEC Stat Dec, Camden accepts £395 revoked Secton has been moved to Ed's own pages. Click red Hyperlink on left. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
If
you pay your PCN, and later find the procedure or PCN was
flawed, the standard response is;
Mr. A. Nother
PCN Processing Unit,
Thur, 7 Jun 2007 22:25:58 Ref: AN / 000000 PCN number CD....... “PCN payments under duress of escalation, implied consent” Thank you for your letter concerning the above. Please take notice of several comments and oblige.
I note your comments and would respond as follows;
Thank you . Yours faithfully,
Mr. A. Nother
PCN Processing Unit,
Thur, 7 Jun 2007 22:25:58 Ref: AN / 000000 PCN number CD....... “PCN payments under duress of escalation, implied consent” Thank you for your letter concerning the above. Please take notice of several comments and oblige.
I note your comments and would respond as follows;
Thank you . Yours faithfully,
If you are then told, you can challenge the PCN etc, or paying means consent, then ensure you pay before and tell them after, OR tell them, DO NOT ASK ME TO repeat myself. CONSENT is SOMETHING I never give under these circumstance, SUBMIT YES, if you want to say white is black, and force me to agree, under pain of torture, I will agree, so long as you know I am saying yes BECAUSE of the threat. that is NOT consent, that is bullying and torture. You need to play your pert in stopping the brainwashing on telling you what YOU think and do, when you know different. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
HIGH COURT VICTORY for Motorists. If anyone has ANY COUNCIL'S Parking tickets without a DATE of ISSUE ( or date of notice, SEE the ongoing update on this HERE )on the body of the PCN, it is grounds for cancellation, & probably a refund. Even if Clamped... Today’s test case decision by Mr. Justice Jackson ruled that Barnet’s parking tickets were invalid as they did not have two dates on them, one a date of contravention and the other a date of issue. He also said that any parking ticket needs those two dates to be valid. ~~This report is AS I have been supplied with it from lmag, we are awaiting the actual transcript. SEARCH google for LMAG or go to http://www.lmag.org.uk Examples of letters of representation are at look for REBUT parking fines on home menu. 53 reasons for cancelling a parking ticket. From: London Motorists Action Group Barnet Council today lost its application for Judicial Review of the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service (PATAS) decision Barnet V Moses. Barnet Council’s parking tickets were judged to be invalid in a landmark case decided in the High Court today. Mr. Justice Jackson ruled that Barnet’s parking tickets were invalid as they did not have two dates on them, one a date of contravention and the other a date of issue. In the case of Hugh Moses – v - Barnet, Barrie Segal the founder of www.AppealNow.com™, represented Mr. Moses at the Parking Adjudicator and challenged the validity of Barnet Council’s parking tickets on the grounds that they did not have a date of issue. Two separate Parking Adjudicators upheld Mr. Segal’s argument and agreed that Barnet Council’s parking tickets were invalid. Barnet Council took the matter to the High Court and challenged the decisions. Today’s test case decision by Mr. Justice Jackson ruled that Barnet’s parking tickets were invalid as they did not have two dates on them, one a date of contravention and the other a date of issue. He also said that any parking ticket needs those two dates to be valid. Barrie of www.AppealNow.com™, who has also successfully challenged the validity of parking tickets of Lambeth and Tower Hamlets says “This is a stunning victory for motorists who have had to put up for years with arrogant councils whose parking tickets were invalid. Barnet Council is the worst council - they have even sent bailiffs in to repossess and sell the car of a blue badge driver, all based on these illegally issued parking tickets. This legal precedent also in my view opens up a huge problems for Councils all over the UK” Says Barrie “Parking tickets have to comply with a strict legal requirement. Under the Road Traffic Act 1991 the date of issue, amongst other things, must be shown on the parking ticket. In the Barnet and other cases it was not. On a separate note Money Programme: Parking Mad Friday 4th August 2006, 7pm, BBC2 Parking in Britain is big business. Last year UK drivers paid out over £1 billion for the privilege of parking on our own streets. Local Authorities and private companies like NCP and APCOA are raking in millions but is it right to make money out of law enforcement? Are they thinking too much about money and too little about keeping traffic moving? Money Programme reporter Libby Potter goes in search of the perfect parking space and asks who’s really to blame for driving Britain’s motorists Parking Mad. LMAG has done its best to furnish the producers with relevant information. The Forum once again shows its value to the media. regards LMAG www.lmag.org.uk Go to http://www.logiclaw.co.uk and select HOME, REBUT Parking Tickets & Handling Bailiffs. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
THAT LONG AWAITED FULL TRANSCRIPT, confirming what has been said in detail. Neutral Citation Number: [2006] EWHC 2357 (Admin) CO/3355/2006 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUSTICE Royal
Courts of Justice B e f o r e : MR
JUSTICE JACKSON THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL (CLAIMANT) -v - THE PARKING ADJUDICATOR (DEFENDANT)
THIS TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN HIGHLIGHTED IN RED AND BLUE, (NOT MODIFIED IN ANY OTHER WAY) To make it easier to go directly to the relevant sections and understand quickly if and why a PCN is compliant or not...... Click HERE to go directly to the first highlight, and subsequent sections thereafter. Computer
-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of ____________________ MR
M LEWIS AND MISS X MONTES -MANZANO (instructed by LB Barnet)
appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT HTML
VERSION OF JUDGMENT Crown Copyright ©
(4) In subsection (3)(d) above "specified proportion" means such proportion applicable to all cases, as may be determined by the London authorities acting through the Joint Committee . . . (7) Schedule 6 to this Act shall have effect with respect to penalty charges, notices to owners and other matters supplementing the provisions of this section." | |||||||||||||||||||||
