|
This is to be written
up.... This section refers to CPR 75. 5 where the bailiff is
hovering, the coucil have rejected your appeal, and the court
officer at TEC has to take a decision, behind closed doors. You
have to be VERY careful here. A form N244 must be filed as soon
as the decision is taken, to get the case transferred to the
local CC and that enables you to get eventually and possibly a
FAIR and PUBLIC trial, also. TF. Meantime read here...
|
|
* Culpability
as
the function of anticipation and expectation. * Syllogistic
reasoning with either the classic major & minor premises or
implied premises. * The three laws of thought that render
judgments irrefutable in any time, world or space. * Their
corresponding verification using matrix truth tables in the
calculus of logic. * Judgments of subsumption and
comparison. * Scientific Methodology and its substrate of
necessary and sufficient conditions in nomic relationships. *
Venn Diagrams and class concepts. * Frege's 'Sense and
Reference', and Russel's 'On Denoting'. * Newtons 1st
law of motion upgraded with the teleology of goal seeking
entities, and observations of their employment in what is best
described as the function of a goal and the critical path being
followed in a course of conduct, that includes the management of
personnel on a 'need to know' basis and precision manipulation
to permit the parties coming to the front and stating truthfully
they are 'NOT AWARE'. * Widespread use of economy of truth,
and false emphasis in the art of 'suppression veri' and
'suggestio falsi'. * Cloaking assertions in the aforesaid
economies of truth, and providing the context that gives them
credibility and authority that is fallacious. * Classic
fallacies, plus a new set of fallacies of conduct observed in
widespread use, and underpinning 'spin'.
References
are also made to Heraclitus, theory of flux, Plato's forms, and
Aristotle's laws of thought, where the chrono topology of the
laws of thought is set outside the framework. * And the more
objective correspondence theory that is intuitive in
Aristotle's definition of Truth as opposed to Russell's that is
more subjective. * Unambiguous and unequivocal contextual
inferencing, a discipline that is not as far as the author can
see, used widely if at all. It has its complexities and
relies on aggregates of conjunctive and disjunctive
propositions. Probably this is the more difficult to
understand, but is was many times, and in a cause in action
twice, to absolute precision in a determination, and
established as very reliable at a high level in the balance of
probabilities. Where possible, these will be explained in short
sentences that give greater insight. The academia for these
expositions are not required by the reader at all, they are
stated as references, and will be referred to very briefly.
While this all sounds perhaps somewhat pretentious, I shall
depose two sentences that are exemplary of two of the
disciplines in use here, to show they are most certainly not
mere abstractions but that civilisation as we know it relies on
them entirely for their efficacy and pragmatic reliability. TWO
disciplines.
1.
Scientific methodology and the use of necessary and sufficient
conditions.
Sufficient
and necessary conditions.
Best
expressed as a conditional, easily understood in this simplest
of unqualified example.
IF
there is one simple condition, or nomic relationship for the
existence of life, THEN,
the
presence of oxygen is necessary
for life, if and only if the
absence of oxygen is sufficient
for the absence of life.
If
there are more conditions, then substitute water for oxygen in
the above and you have two conditions or causes.
If
there are more, one may substitute vitamin D, and observe what
happens and discover that where it is absent then rickets
occurs and where present it does not, so that has determined a
cause of rickets, but not life. These principles are behind
medical aetiologies, and all nomic or causal relationships.
2.
Truth and correspondence, theory much easier.
”To
say of what is that it is
not, or of what is
not that it is, is
false, while
to say of what is that it
is, or of what is
not that it is not, is
true.”
|