|
The observations in three areas of abuse have
shown the synthetic manufacture and usage of 'drift of
circumstance' to imply either 'postal' or 'respondent'
delinquency in conduct as opposed to and carried out by the
penal authorities.
There is a reasonably precise art to
wilful omissions, (that are as culpable as acts but less obvious
due to cloaking the mens rea and
non existence of actus reus (an ommission)
, since real acts cannot be so cloaked, they leave
traces). Omissions are discerned in much the same manner as the
presence of a black hole, by the vortices and gravitational pull
in the surrounding area. In a course of conduct it is done by
contextual
inferencing that is unambiguous in its conclusions.
First,DOUBT! Then find out!
Consider
the time it takes for a council to respond to a Notice to Owner
(NTO) that is submitted by an appellant. The appellant usually
posts his NTO to the council, they respond in due time with a
Notice of rejection accompanied with an appeal form to either
pay £100 or go to PATAS or NPAS. This all takes about 4-6
weeks. IF this period of time is notable for the absence of a
NoR and Appeal, and then all the
appellant receives is a Charge Certificate (CC), then all the
temporal sequences are accounted for. BUT, where the appellant
has received a CC and he was NOT delinquent, responded to it,
and posted recorded, or as this contributor did, handed it in
with a receipt requested. Then a
new game commences. The grounds for raising a CC are covered in
the failure to pay, or failure to respond to the NTO, and some
councils, those who insist on representations in writing,
that is to say, with the suppressed meaning in “writing
by post”, there lies a world of
opportunities. The council may deny the receipt of the NTO, and
or suggest the post or motorist was delinquent and the CC has
grounds for being thus enforced unless the respondent is
sufficiently cogent ion argument and self abasing in pleas as to
rely on the council's discretion and pity. In such circumstance,
unless certain, you will need to kneel at the altar. Shortly
there will be the full explanation of precisely how this was
proved and admission gained by a Freedom of Information
question
Hence, if one has responded to a NTO and relies on
possible delinquencies in the council's post room, or the post
offices failure one is relying on what is clearly observed in
today's world of zeal for revenue, trust,
that is embodied on the code of ethic or conduct which
is set aside in the zeal for revenue and opportunity to
do away with all the PATAS / NPAS / TEC and other hearings. It
cuts the entire process down to just 6 weeks from a possible 4-6
months. A case in a cause of action with this precise flaw, and
proven admission derived from unequivocal contextual inferencing
has rendered the defendant in a particularly egregious
circumstance of being caught in flagrante delicto', red handed.
It's easy to do, and the methodology is sufficiently closed for
abuse by obtaining a receipt at the post room office of the
council, rather than one at the post office. That's the first
warning and advice to take care and be surer
rather than poorer.
Where this occurs it has two
profound consequences.
1. Breach of Statutory Duty
in Schedule 6. here....
(7)
It shall be the duty of an authority to
whom representations are duly made under this paragraph—
(b) to
serve on that person notice of their decision as to
whether they accept that the ground in question has been
established.
2. Automatic breach
of the UK Human Rights Act 1998, and by derogation thereof the
EU HR Convention Protocol 5 article 6. here...
6.
In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of
any criminal charge against him, everyone
is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a
reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal
established by law.
There is also an element of Fraud; in the
Fraud act 2006, where fraud is perpetrated or attempted by
false representation.
2 Fraud by false representation
(1)
A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a)
dishonestly makes a false representation,
and
(b) intends, by making the
representation—
(i) to make a
gain for himself or another, or
(ii) to cause loss to
another or to expose another to a risk of
loss.
That is what is being done in the name of ONE law, or
scheme, and its collateral effects on others that renders it
actionable.
|
|
* Culpability
as
the function of anticipation and expectation.
* Syllogistic
reasoning with either the classic major & minor premises or
implied premises.
* The three laws of thought that render
judgments irrefutable in any time, world or space.
* Their
corresponding verification using matrix truth tables in the
calculus of logic.
* Judgments of subsumption and
comparison.
* Scientific Methodology and its substrate of
necessary and sufficient conditions in nomic relationships.
*
Venn Diagrams and class concepts.
* Frege's 'Sense and
Reference', and Russel's 'On Denoting'.
* Newtons 1st
law of motion upgraded with the teleology of goal seeking
entities, and observations of their employment in what is best
described as the function of a goal and the critical path being
followed in a course of conduct, that includes the management of
personnel on a 'need to know' basis and precision manipulation
to permit the parties coming to the front and stating truthfully
they are 'NOT AWARE'.
* Widespread use of economy of truth,
and false emphasis in the art of 'suppression veri' and
'suggestio falsi'.
* Cloaking assertions in the aforesaid
economies of truth, and providing the context that gives them
credibility and authority that is fallacious.
* Classic
fallacies, plus a new set of fallacies of conduct observed in
widespread use, and underpinning 'spin'.
References
are also made to Heraclitus, theory of flux, Plato's forms, and
Aristotle's laws of thought, where the chrono topology of the
laws of thought is set outside the framework.
* And the more
objective correspondence theory that is intuitive in
Aristotle's definition of Truth as opposed to Russell's that is
more subjective.
* Unambiguous and unequivocal contextual
inferencing, a discipline that is not as far as the author can
see,
used widely if at all.
It has its complexities and
relies on aggregates of conjunctive and disjunctive
propositions. Probably this is the more difficult to
understand, but is was many times, and in a cause in action
twice, to absolute precision in a determination, and
established as very reliable at a high level in the balance of
probabilities. Where possible, these will be explained in short
sentences that give greater insight.
The academia for these
expositions are not required by the reader at all, they are
stated as references, and will be referred to very briefly.
While this all sounds perhaps somewhat pretentious, I shall
depose two sentences that are exemplary of two of the
disciplines in use here, to show they are most certainly not
mere abstractions but that civilisation as we know it relies on
them entirely for their efficacy and pragmatic reliability.
TWO
disciplines.
1.
Scientific methodology and the use of necessary and sufficient
conditions.
Sufficient
and necessary conditions.
Best
expressed as a conditional, easily understood in this simplest
of unqualified example.
IF
there is one simple condition, or nomic relationship for the
existence of life, THEN,
the
presence of oxygen is necessary
for life, if and only if the
absence of oxygen is sufficient
for the absence of life.
If
there are more conditions, then substitute water for oxygen in
the above and you have two conditions or causes.
If
there are more, one may substitute vitamin D, and observe what
happens and discover that where it is absent then rickets
occurs and where present it does not, so that has determined a
cause of rickets, but not life. These principles are behind
medical aetiologies, and all nomic or causal relationships.
2.
Truth and correspondence, theory much easier.
”To
say of what is that it is
not, or of what is
not that it is, is
false,
while
to say of what is that it
is, or of what is
not that it is not, is
true.”
|
