Three of the top sites in the world FREE… click on the pics.

The Force of Destiny

WORLD's Best Books Free 2000 +

Logic Law Number one site

 False wrapped in truths of irrelevance.

It (false) BURNS does it not?

That is the persuasion semantics being used by powers against the weak.

O gracious Duke, // Harp not on that; nor do not banish reason // For inequality; but let your reason serve
To make the truth appear where it seems hid, // And hide the false seems true.” Shakespeare...

LOOK at the TOC - INDEX and FRAUD sections HERE
THIS EXPOSES the language of modal periphrasis forms of persuasion
which enters the subconscious below the limen (sub-limenal),
in a way that is indescernable to the person who is not familiar wth logic or language, and its morphology.
The BANKS use it, in what is described as an understatement, in rhetoric click the link – a form of litotes.

When they performed their PPI and other scandals, they referred to it as “It was NOT our finest moment”

Over 100 pages being released

Here is page 128.

Here are some the statutes you have breached with a clear will and intent. Knowledge the mens reais a precise correlate, and I shall disclose at the appropriate juncture the full nature of your 'give in evidence' which by the way, for the avoidance of doubt, the 'in' is not a preposition but an adverb. I trust we both have the same cognitive significance at the heart of admissions with silent seemings.


..................PART LIST OF STATUTES BREACHED:

1 Fraud Act 2006, c35. 4 sections 2,3,4,12, all admitted, proven, corroborated.

NOT one controverted! From July to Dec 2012, at least

ONE HUNDRED & FIFTY (150) breaches in 4 sections; just a partial list.

2 Theft Act 1968, c60. S 18,19,20,21.

A rough estimate 5 times directly; 2 times indirectly.

3 Protection from Harassment Act 1997, c40.

Now well into 8 times, under the cloak of disparate & cognitive continuity of staff.

4 Perjury Act 1911, s5.

Same as for Fraud Act 150 utterances not disputed, all admitted. More tba.

5 Misrepresentation Act 1967, c7.

Similar to for Fraud Act.

6 Malicious Communications Act 1988, c27

7 Data Protection Act 1998, c29,

Now well into 8 breaches, section 10, purposes et al., more tba.

8 Consumer Credit Act 2006, c14, as amended 1974, several sections,

Either improperly executed or not at all: OR

9 Bills of Exchange Act 1882,c61, s23

Signatures for liability

10 Pre-action protocol, and CPR, thus far, antonymous to any moral integrity or

Integrity or truth; better described thus far as a perjurous farce.

Nevertheless 'We have a proud history of innovation,'

Does that mean you are proud, or his-story is? Is the above your very own innovation?

__________________________

'providing them with the best service we possibly can;' the lowest possible by comparison...

'11 Jan 2012 – German-owned Npower came out worst of the big six, with only 41 per cent of ..'



Contents Top Qdx p1 Bundle 2 WINTER V NPOWER DRAFT not proof read Page 36 of 148

GET this in PDF format here....


All communications will be stored, and remain on file UNTIL these matters are addressed.



Table of Contents

*** FORMAL NOTICE *** 1

*** IMPORTANT for YOU *** 1

*** PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL, *** 1

* FRAUD ACT 2006 * ' Responsible business practice is critical to our success as a company?' 2

02/04/12 06:44:33 PM used as my reference. NOTICE: PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL & CPR. 15

Duty of the parties 15

The parties are required to help the court to further the overriding objective. 15

2.Fraud by false representation – See list beginning here. Tacitly admitted. 15

3.Fraud by failing to disclose information – See list beginning here. Admitted by Breach. 15

4.Fraud by abuse of position – See list beginning 15

Supplementary 15

12.Liability of company officers for offences by company. – See list beginning 15

The Tort of GROSS negligence: culpa lata dolo aequiparatur – EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE? 15

Misrepresentations Act 1967. s2. 15

Perjury Act 1911, s5. 15

*** FORMAL NOTICE *** - CEO. Sent 7th Aug. 28

Moving matters forward: as of 7th August 2012 incl: Mr V. Becker. 29

Here is your starting 'position letter'. 31

Here is your starting 'position letter'. Yet again, as you over looked it. 34

FRAUD ACT s12: PROVED, disclosed, admitted: CEO committed, consented connived. 35

TWO FOLD EVIDENCE saved for public expose. 35

Your very own Lingua lapsa verum dicit accompanied with your own testimony: 35

where you could not possibly know unless – see here. 35

On P16 L18, was a part quote, look it up: the remainder shows the obvious long ago. 35

19 + more coming – Specific ADMIT Questions unanswered in Pre Action Protocol – 16.5 (5) 39

12 + 12 more coming – Failures to DISCLOSE CONTRARY to Fraud Act s3 39

so far – FORTY NINE breaches of the Fraud Act alone. 40

A few highlights that disclose directing mind's commitment to their mission in PR. 43

Sharon Harvey: directing minds overlooking with unashamed audacity. 44

Kevin Scott's discloses anachronic problems, with circumlocutions: 44

Blank for continuation of the NOTICES TO ADMIT, DISCLOSE, FA s2,3 49

UNDER pre-action protocol, SECTION III, having received NOTICE of court procedure. 52

ALL ALLEGATIONS here – only 35% so far – ARE taken as ADMITTED. 52

Proof of ABUSE of Position, and TACIT connivance – your docs – FA s4,12. 56

DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE: in Qdx: 'QC' – 'DA' , for later exposure & proofs. 58

Due to your unambiguous and abysmal failure in CPR 16.5, the court rules provide that: 58

CPR 16.5: YOU HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ADMIT each / every allegation, see here. 58

YOU have made two statements in contrariety, rebutting your entire empty procedure. 58

I suggest you do NOT confer upon me any impediment or detriment ELSE 58

I shall IMMEDIATELY apply for an INJUNCTION to cease, desist AND: 58

WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICES, I shall ISSUE PROCEEDINGS at my discretion OR 58

Here disclosed the 1st & 2nd escrow sum of 2 * £96: to be collected before an upright judge. 59

Payment held by YOUR CAUSE – team unable to 'gain an understanding' of simple request. 59

Following FULL AWARENESS of Mr. V. Becker, fraudulent representations continue. 59

Exhibit 5. 48 false representations and 1 clear contradiction, obvious seeming amnesia. 60

Exhibit 6a. 46DP: false representations and 1 clear own goal, in seeming amnesia. 61

By full awareness Mr. V. Becker: unambiguously & wilfully silent, contrary to CPR 62

29 initial NOTICES – many more added currently 43– to ADMIT and DISCLOSE 62

Exhibit 6R. Npower's Kevin Scott discloses anachronic problems. 63

Np-Restricted until end of business day 17th inst, thereafter disclosed wider...reason here 63

By full awareness Mr. V. Becker: unambiguously & wilfully is silent, contrary to CPR 63

UNLESS Mr. V.Beckers and or Ms J. Jaglowsci DO – below, then they take responsibility... 64

DOCUMENTS to be verified by a statement of truth by Messrs J. Jaglowsi & V. Beckers. 64

You are invited: in simple SVO language sans periphrastic, to email me a withdrawal letter by 65

** NON-NEGOTIABLE ** 67

Your - 'our proposals to resolve this matter are reasonable' PROVES your empty review 72

The 'review; query, complaint' each; I never requested or made; proof HOW you converted it. 73

Incontrovertible evidence: denial impossible, even by shifting and hedging. 73

Exhibit 7. 6 false representations and 1 clear contradiction, obvious seeming amnesia. 77

Exhibit 8. 6 false representations and 1 clear contradiction, obvious seeming amnesia. 78

Your style! 'BALANCE brought forward' £1750 *2 you owe me – looked over & overlooked. 79

Exhibit 9. 2+ more false representations, 1 ignoratio, and 1 obtuse conditional statement. 81

Exhibit 9R. Sharon Harvey: directing minds overlooking with unashamed audacity. 82

Exhibit 10. 4+ more false and misleading representations. ABUSE of position FA s4. 85

Exhibit 11. ambiguous references to be determined. 86

The 'Executives will be in touch with you to address the points' raised … letter. 86

Exhibit 12. the 4th letter – final = 'leaving nothing to be looked for or expected' Look it up! 90

10 DP's: 1 misleading, 2 false representations & 4 con-textual circumlocutions. 91

Here is your starting 'position letter'. Yet again, as you over looked it. 91

Ex 13 discloses full consent & connivance of V. Beckers & J. Jaglowski. FA s2,3,4,12. 95

Ex 14 discloses intended breach: Theft Act s17,18 21, proved & admitted Fraud s2,3,4,12. 95

“FAT cat energy firms will be forced to pay compensation to every customer they rip off” 96

On Thursday, 25 October 2012, 6:14, I received this from you. 97

CLAIM or COUNTER-CLAIM for the court. (Draft) 102

Particulars of Claim – Level 1 – Lines . 104

Particulars of Claim – Level 2 – Paragraphs. 104

Additional pages brought forward from BUNDLE 1. January 2012 108

PROOF that the DIRECTOR, and CEO were FULLY AWARE, contrary to FA. S4, s12. 109

40 PAGES EVIDENCE: from your OWN con-text, and additional grounds from Mr. Winter. 109

The evidence that contradicts all communications from Npower, proving fraud – estoppel. 110

REVOCATION NOTICE of licence under common law for visit, without warrant & consent. 112

Incontrovertible exhibit evidence: denial impossible, even by shifting and hedging. 112

BE CERTAIN of compliance: Rights of Entry (Gas and Electricity Boards) Act 1954: s2. 1 116

BE CERTAIN of compliance – Schedule 6 of the Electricity Act 1989 (3) 116

YOU caused detriment to my disabilities, medical results Feb: Damages move to unlimited. 116

Make CERTAIN I receive the 14 day Human Rights Act notice – POD. 117

Be CERTAIN warrant application DISCLOSES dispute, & NON-PMT by YOUR CAUSE. 117

Make CERTAIN you present full particulars of claim with substantive BILL & audit trail. 117

Estoppel by your very own representation: check Halsbury which you 'should' know. 117

REMINDER, like you, 'BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD' you owe me £3772.55 +. 117

Your wilful obstruction to switch-over increases our costs, augmenting your blackmail. 117

You have harassed increasingly, for a month now, and this grows with it. 117

Profiling the mens rea with objects of thought. 119

Profiling the mens rea with objects of factual performances. 119

Profiling the mens rea with objects of law. 120

Prominent most significant attributes and properties that classify the above: 120

Factors indicating higher culpability 127

Factors indicating significantly lower culpability 127

Factors indicating a more than usually serious degree of harm 127

Repudiation of Contract 128

Come and explore our World of Bright ideas. [NO facts please] ...npower.... 140

Your npower Query 146

implied contract 148

implied-in-fact contract 148

implied-in-law contract 148


More to come.



THIS is your starting position.

Look it ALL over without over looking any part. Partial list of statutory breaches you have committed. NOTHING moves forward, UNTIL these are answered (Y/N) & DISCLOSED.

Mandatory Notices to Admit, and requests to DISCLOSE ALL breached in statutes and CPR.

19 + more coming – Specific ADMIT Questions unanswered in Pre Action Protocol – 16.5 (5)



Alphabetical Index

Q1. ADMIT 'Account balance before charges '£871.57 is a FALSE Representation s2, (Y/N) 12

Q2. ADMIT Account balance before charges '£871.57 Failure to Disclose – Breach of s3 (Y/N). 12

Q3. ADMIT '...tel...number...no longer seems to work'. is a False Representation (Y/N). 12

Q4. ADMIT the above Representation is FALSE (Y/N) or produce as stated just above. 11

Q5. ADMIT you have not yet apologised, and you mislead to say otherwise (Y/N). 11

Q6 ADMIT your failure to reply or disclose within your stated time at least five times. (y/n)? 10

Q7. ADMIT you FAILED to disclose that bill, namely P22. 1.(a-d) detailed here yet again, 23

Q9. ADMIT such a documented agreement – does NOT exist 24

Q9a.ADMIT that 'would like...[ x ] wrote off ' is a false representation: because 24

QA. ADMIT – CEO, that nobody performed my 'IMMEDIATE' request on para 4 above (Y/N)? 28

QB. ADMIT – CEO, that 'IMMEDIATE' performance occurred and you ignored it (Y/N)? 28

QC. ADMIT that QC is a false representation – converted by indirect narration or 58

QD. ADMIT that your 'response' to my letter to your CEO, IS with his consent – FA2006 s12. 35

QE. ADMIT CEO! Your handing my email to D. Bailey, breaches s12: consent & connivance. 35

QF. ADMITTED, and proved by yourself, YOUR CEO has committed the offence. 72

QG. ADMITTED, and proved by yourself, YOU have breached section 4, abuse of position. 72

QH. ADMIT - I, Ms Julie. Jaglowski, do swear that all Npower communications 64

QI. ADMIT - I, Mr. Volker. Beckers, do swear that all Npower communications 64

QV. ADMIT, that Ex5, contains NO 'proposal' whatever? Or goto DE 72

QW. ADMIT, it is impossible to predicate 'reasonable' of a non-entity? Or goto DF 72


For QJ-QU ADMIT... see below here

More to come.

12 + 12 more coming – Failures to DISCLOSE CONTRARY to Fraud Act s3



User-Defined Index

D1. DISCLOSE a copy of any document from myself, discussing with anyone my happiness. 11

D2. DISCLOSE the true copy of the document on which your … BALANCE.. relies. 12

D5. DISCLOSE date of document issue: WHY were we not shown it at that time? 12

D3. DISCLOSE – Jeanette Cook -- a true copy of your call log to this number. 12

D4. DISCLOSE – Jane Ferguson p 21 para 6 – a true copy of your call log to this number. 12

D6. DISCLOSE – Carol Allison – a true copy of your call log to this number. 12

D7. DISCLOSE any true copy of an original agreement between us. 23

D8. DISCLOSE such agreement where anyone here stated they will pay for your negligence. 23

D9. DISCLOSE the text, or recording where I stated 'would like...be wrote [sic] off 24

DA. DISCLOSE the true copy of the document DA, its audit trail, & DATE it was MADE UP. 58

DC. DISCLOSED, and proved by yourself, YOUR CEO has committed the offence. 72

DD. DISCLOSED, and proved by yourself, YOU have breached section 4, abuse of position. 72

DE. DISCLOSE where in exh5 there is another term 'proposal'. 72

DF. DISCLOSE how you attribute something to or about nothing. 72


Of course here are the 14 MORE ADMISSIONS

for you to ADMIT Failures to disclose. SINCE 8th Aug 2012


For EACH item D1-DF+, thus for each item QJ-QU

ADMIT – your 'failure to disclose', seriatim, –

in BREACH of Fraud Act s3, Perjury Act s5, et al,

and in pre-action protocol else all

is unambiguously 'TAKEN AS ADMITTED' CPR 16.5 (5)

A grand PART total of (well over 100)

so far – FORTY NINE breaches of the Fraud Act alone.

Return to QU index.

If you assign or pass on any alleged debt without this full documentation, and

WITHOUT DEALING WITH THE ALLEGATIONS AND ADMIT & DISCLOSE, Qdx

YOU WILLINGLY AGREE TO PAY ME a further £5000 IN DAMAGES,

for adding new conspirators and interlopers to your fraud, unwittingly for them, to continue the seeming unawareness where awareness is both traceable and already proved at board level; hence you commit a further multitude of false representations to them, and make them co-conspirators.


And I have neither dealt with other acts nor the remainder of such a plenitude where 1 document alone has at least 46 disparate predications – BUT

WHAT could be easier for any person without requisite mens rea,

who – with it; – requisite mens rea – hides behind silence to evade culpability,

and continues conferring loss Ex Post-Facto in undisputed breach

of the Fraud Act s2,3,4,12; Theft Act 1968 s21 – Blackmail'...unwarranted demand with menaces...'; due to your menaces being based on your subsequent acts and wilful omissions with behavioural aspects in conformity with J. Bentham's principle of utility, and another critical function correlate, of which it is too difficult for you to manifest awareness; to be advised in public.


EITHER ADMIT each item above stated, taking responsibility for your false representations,

OR DISCLOSE denying them – with full documentation / corroboration on what their truth relies.


This document sets out the terms and conditions of our agreement as it unfolded by performance – your choices made knowingly without controverting the defaulted outcome.

Of course you may make a serious proposal to settle amicably – as you stated unmeaning-fully last time. {Time and due allowances for your controverting having fully past}


Following the FORMAL NOTICE received by Mr. V. Beckers on 7th Inst (dated 5th)

I now am satisfied that Both Mr. Beckers – CEO – and Ms Jaglowski – Director – are responsible jointly and separately [as directing minds] in consent and connivance to commit Fraud:


Language of fraud, false representations & misrepresentations.

Npower – energy suppliers – Fraud.

Did NPOWER, approach you early this year, January 2012, 'advising' you they had made an error?

Note just the ONE error–

and that, as 'time unfolds what plighted cunning hides', from that single error dating back FIVE YEARS, YOU owed them a debt of £3800 or thereabout? Keeping silent of course, on the little matter that you never entered into a contract with them, to indemnify them for their error – Properly labelled – incompetence in the extreme, combined with gross negligence for which YOU were to be made responsible.all manufactured from that minuscule error.

Did you request them to DISCLOSE – under the Fraud Act s3 – the existence of such a CONTRACT?

Worse still, did they in their self-esteem and moral integrity, 'advise' you that all was a 'rebuttable presumption' and fable that no such contract existed or did they simply contract such an unthinkably honest expression to a behavioural moment of silence?

Perhaps they should have asked you if you 'would care to take a spin with their PR spinsters or better – semantic butchers.'


Did they then proceed to 'advise' you they would conduct a review, you never requested, on a query you never made, over looking a complaint you never made. Yes they managed all that in their circumlocution exercise on an 'issue' that pointed to the void, they were going to avoid serially, until they manufacture what they described as a 'final position letter'.

_____________________________________________________


Npower Exhibit 0

What does Npower say to you, when you exercise your absolute right to leave them?

Compare it with what they say about themselves,

and what they say to you, when they want to take you on – sorry in. Note the language when you leave, I shall let it to you decide what your call this, since it is “too bad for bad report.”


Here it is with my reply.

AND: directing minds overlooking with unashamed audacity – a euphemism for the true attributes of their language.

Served on their Director and CEO of course.

04/09/12 Ref: From Exhibit 9. With the utmost respect and courtesy.


Dear Ms. S. H.


I have received your recent letter, of which two items: among many, are fascinating.

From your text: 'If you didn't know that you've entered into a gas contract with another and want to stay with us, we'll do everything we can to keep you......' from

  1. In Brief, more detail next page: here is a parallel con-struction which applies to all those whose thought forms identify with yours & DIRECTING yours.

    1. 'If you didn't know that you've entered into an employment contract with Npower and want to leave them, we'll do everything we can to help you......'

    2. There are places specialising in such help.

_____________________________________________________



Npower Exhibit 1

Npower Exhibit 2

Npower Exhibit 3

Npower Exhibit 4

Npower Exhibit 5

Npower Exhibit 6

Npower Exhibit 7

Npower Exhibit 8

Npower Exhibit 9

Npower Exhibit 10

Npower Exhibit 11

Npower Exhibit 12

Npower Exhibit 13

Npower Exhibit 14

Npower Exhibit 15

Npower Exhibit 16

Npower Exhibit 17

Npower Exhibit 18

Npower Exhibit 19

Npower Exhibit 20

Npower Exhibit 21

Npower Exhibit 22

Npower Exhibit 23

Npower Exhibit 24

Npower Exhibit 25

Npower Exhibit 26

Npower Exhibit 27

Npower Exhibit 28

Npower Exhibit 29

Npower Exhibit 30

Npower Exhibit 31

Npower Exhibit 32

Npower Exhibit 33

Npower Exhibit 34

Npower Exhibit 35

Npower Exhibit 36



False wrapped in truths of irrelevance.

ISABELLA. O gracious Duke,

Harp not on that; nor do not banish reason

For inequality; but let your reason serve

To make the truth appear where it seems hid,

And hide the false seems true.

top

Truth
Unveiled
by Time.
Bernini
Truth around 1645

The exquisite sculpture of Bernini,
as an allegory of life today
by abuse of power, money
and strength.

The Rape of Proserpina.

Justice at the
Local Government
Ombudsman
(LGO) PATAS, and TEC
Blind & Off Balance, - Spin.

Local Government Ombudsman Watcher

Local Government Ombudsman Watch

Public Service Ombudsman Watchers








Lloyd's bankers & brokers –






Look at these bays and lines, they are all non complaint.

top




top


top


top

Fly with false aim; move the still-piecing air,

KING. Thou speak'st it falsely, as I love mine honour;

KING. The story, then, goes false you threw it him

CLEOPATRA. Excellent falsehood!

Who have been false to Fulvia? Riotous madness,

CLEOPATRA. O most false love!

POMPEY. Where have you this? 'Tis false.

The armourer of my heart. false, false; this, this.

O this false soul of Egypt! this grave charm-

Pack'd cards with Caesar, and false-play'd my glory

That the false huswife Fortune break her wheel,

Cried, 'O false blood, thou register of lies,

Did livery falseness in a pride of truth.

Of this false jewel, and his amorous spoil.

O, that false fire which in his cheek so glowed,

Made all of false-fac'd soothing. When steel grows

Deserved this so dishonour'd rub, laid falsely

false to my nature? Rather say I play

a cudgel; and yet my mind gave me his clothes made a false report

Stain all your edges on me. 'Boy'! false hound!

With a most false effect; and I the truer

So to be false with her.

IMOGEN. A father cruel and a step-dame false;

Made hard with hourly falsehood- falsehood as

To try your taking of a false report, which hath

Diana's rangers false themselves, yield up

Look through a casement to allure false hearts,

And be false with them.

O, above measure false!

Is fall'n into thy ear! What false Italian-

But that two villains, whose false oaths prevail'd

IMOGEN. false to his bed? What is it to be false?

And cry myself awake? That's false to's bed,

IMOGEN. I false! Thy conscience witness! Iachimo,

IMOGEN. true honest men being heard, like false Aeneas,

Were, in his time, thought false; and Sinon's weeping

Goodly and gallant shall be false and perjur'd

Believe false teachers; though those that are betray'd

Therein false struck, can take no greater wound,

Prove false! Exit

Were to prove false, which I will never be,

Is sorer than to lie for need; and falsehood

Thou art one o' th' false ones. Now I think on thee

Since Leonatus' false.

And never false. Soft, ho! what trunk is here

Wherein I am false I am honest; not true, to be true.

Winnow the truth from falsehood. On, speak to him.

For whom my heart drops blood and my false spirits

By falsehood and corruption doth it shame.

And from my false hand cut the wedding-ring,

For if we two be one, and thou play false,

Muffle your false love with some show of blindness;

Be secret-false. What need she be acquainted?

ADRIANA. Dissembling villain, thou speak'st false in both.

ANTIPHOLUS OF EPHESUS. Dissembling harlot, thou art false in all,

But with these nails I'll pluck out these false eyes

And that is false thou dost report to us.

As this is false he burdens me withal!

And this is false you burden me withal.

Thou canst not then be false to any man.

Your bait of falsehood takes this carp of truth;

Was falsely borne in hand, sends out arrests

Ham. What, frighted with false fire?

As false as dicers' oaths. O, such a deed

Queen. How cheerfully on the false trail they cry!

O, this is counter, you false Danish dogs!

how the wheel becomes it! It is the false steward, that stole his

Stuffing the ears of men with false reports.

They bring smooth comforts false, worse than true wrongs.

manner of wrenching the true cause the false way. It is not a

That great Northumberland, then false to him,

Would of that seed grow to a greater falseness;

That every slight and false-derived cause,

As a false favourite doth his prince's name,

As for your spiteful false objections,

any such matter. God is my witness, I am falsely accus'd by the

false fiend, avoid! Thunder and lightning. Exit SPIRIT

And York, and impious Beaufort, that false priest,

By false accuse doth level at my life.

I shall not want false witness to condemn me

false allegations to o'erthrow his state?

Beshrew the winners, for they play'd me false!

Ah, that my fear were false! ah, that it were!

That e'er I prov'd thee false or fear'd thy faith.

But now return we to the false Duke Humphrey.

Am I not witch'd like her? Or thou not false like him?

If my suspect be false, forgive me, God;

WARWICK. What dares not Warwick, if false Suffolk dare him?

I would, false murd'rous coward, on thy knee

From such fell serpents as false Suffolk is;

The false revolting Normans thorough thee

WILLIAM STAFFORD. That's false.

They call false caterpillars and intend their death.

false king, why hast thou broken faith with me,

I am thy king, and thou a false-heart traitor.

Back'd by the power of Warwick, that false peer,

'Gainst thee, fell Clifford, and thee, false Frenchwoman.

By that false woman as this king by thee.

Now buckler falsehood with a pedigree?

Thy sly conveyance and thy lord's false love;

And tell false Edward, thy supposed king,

Shall cross the seas and bid false Edward battle:

'Go tell false Edward, the supposed king,

Either betray'd by falsehood of his guard

Prince. Thou judgest false already. I mean, thou shalt have the

prove a false thief; for the poor abuses of the time want

falsehood may.

Cham. Nay, rather let me have it, as you are a false thief.

Fal. 'Sblood, my lord, they are false! Nay, I'll tickle ye for a

tongue, and I thine, most truly falsely, must needs be granted to

KING HENRY. Now, fie upon my false French! By mine honour, in true

No prophet will I trust if she prove false. Exeunt

Nor any of his false confederates.

I see report is fabulous and false.false,



Nice to print the allegation and PR replie without a rebuttal. Four comments were put to Evening standard NONE put forward.

How Camden HIDES TRUTH......in economic economic PR statements for gain.

Their spokesman and --- SPOKES. Emphasis added.

A spokesman for Camden council said: "We are confident we have acted lawfully. The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984. Therefore the changes brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing Traffic Management Orders."

Constructing what LOOKS like a syllogism, HOW to tell a seeming truth while HIDING a LIE.... Questions not answered or specified,

1."We are confident we have acted lawfully. ---- WHEN, during which period of relevancy? Note the choice of preterite tense. It may be that they have acted ... but it is not that they are acting during the relevant period of time.. ( suppresio veri suggesti falsi, law dictionary means Fraud see here, and the meaning of false representations in the fraud act, sections 1-4 even if it is misleading.)

2.The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984.----- SO WHAT? HAVE THEY EXERCISED that POWER LAWFULLY during the relevant period?

3.Therefore ..... (Based on TWO hypothetical premisses, undetermined as to TRUTH, we make a conclusion that MAY be true or false, BUT is irrelevant anyway..)

a)......................the changes brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing Traffic Management Orders." ( Which existing TMO's AND or TRO's? The ONE or TWO that MAY have been compliant, or the HUNDREDS that are NOT?..... They may still be still 'valid' in that they have been made correctly. However, they are not 'in force' because there are no powers to issue PCNs until the provision ie. under the 1991 Road Traffic Act ... is amended or varied to the TMA 2004 and Penalty Charge Notices issued by Parking Attendants is amended to PCNs issued by CEOs )

This is an amalgam of fallacies. First fallacy species of 'petitio principii', the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises; Namely the conclusion is based on an ASSUMPTION that is undetermined and IS the issue to be PROVED. THE TMA changes ARE MANDATORY.... Other internal fallacies, Fallacy species of 'ignoratio elenchi' ; ( presenting an argument that may in itself be valid, but doesn't address the issue in question) then choosing and using qualifiers that are irrelevant and ignoring ones that are. The Swapping out a relevant term(s) for an irrelevant one, We are NOT concerned with the validity of paperwork we are concerned with it's LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY. There are MANY more here. ONLY for the specialist. For the average reader this is probably already too much. This conscious swapping is 'mens rea' to the depostion in writing and is profiled by the agenda of target driven revenue in the newly so called, 'baseline performance indicators'. It is the art or economic and economic truth, heralded in when New labour called in advertising pr agencies to promote its policies in the abstract.

Logic Laws fallacies at Force of Destiny. Here and more on Camden's nice 'representations. Fallacies of independence click on top choices P1, P2 here.

Use Neil's site and get your appeal in. NOT to save just £50-60 but to Send a message to so called 'authorities' that they are COUNCILS, and public SERVANTS with a duty to act lawfully. Go to top, and click on parking appeal banners.

The period of concern is 31st March to 18th April 2008.

The legality of the Tro, and Tmo (Traffic Regulation / Management Orders ) is related to changes that have to be made to references that must refer to the TMA 2004, and NO LONGER to the RTA 1991.

If you make an appeal.

Go here, briefly look at pictures of Camden's NON compliant bay lines, then click to Neil Heron's Parking Appeal's website and subscribe for details of how to challenge the PCN. It would be remarkable of PATAS, to dismisses an appeal on grounds put in the way provided by parking appeals, and we shall all be watching over the shoulder at PATAS to observe what they do, and HOW they reason, just like Camden.

Suppressio veri suggestio falsi is Latin for suppression of the truth is the suggestion of falsehood. IT has manifest and remarkable aspect of FRAUD. Look below...

SUPPRESSIO VERI - Concealment of truth.

In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness.

Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution.

SUGGESTIO FALSI

SUGGESTIO FALSI. A statement of a falsehood. This amounts to a fraud whenever the party making it was bound to disclose the truth. (WHOLE TRUTH THAT IS) whenever the party making it was bound to disclose the truth. 2. The following is an example of a case where chancery will interfere 2. The following is an example of a case where chancery will interfere and. set aside a contract as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: and. set aside a contract as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: a purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild land, and a purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild land, and represented to him it was worth nothing, except for a sheep pasture, when he represented to him it was worth nothing, except for a sheep pasture, when he knew there was a valuable mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. knew there was a valuable mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. The sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837, et seq. Vide The sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837, et seq. Vide Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation; Suppressio veri. Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation; Suppressio veri.

http://www.law-dictionary.org/SUGGESTIO+FALSI.asp?q=SUGGESTIO+FALSI

SUPPRESSIO VERI

SUPPRESSIO VERI. Concealment of truth. 2. In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to 2. In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than and form a due estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness. any other, the parties are required to represent every thing with fairness. 1 Bla. Rep. 594; 3 Burr. 1809. 1 Bla. Rep. 594; 3 Burr. 1809. 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind an agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. 138; 1 Fonb. Eq. c. 2, s. 8; 1 Ball

http://www.law-dictionary.org/ld.asp?q=SUPPRESSIO+VERI

top






top