Three of the top sites in
the world FREE… click on the pics.
wrapped in truths of irrelevance.
(false) BURNS does it not?
That is the persuasion
semantics being used by powers against the weak.
gracious Duke, // Harp not on that; nor do
not banish reason
but let your reason
To make the
appear where it seems
hid, // And hide
at the TOC - INDEX and FRAUD sections HERE
EXPOSES the language of modal periphrasis forms of persuasion
enters the subconscious below the limen (sub-limenal),
a way that is indescernable to the person who is not familiar wth
logic or language, and its morphology.
BANKS use it, in what is described as an understatement,
the link – a
form of litotes.
they performed their PPI and other scandals, they referred to it as
“It was NOT our finest moment”
100 pages being released
is page 128.
are some the statutes you have breached with a clear
will and intent. Knowledge –
a precise correlate, and I shall disclose at the appropriate
juncture the full nature of your 'give
which by the way, for the avoidance of doubt, the 'in'
is not a preposition but an adverb. I trust we both have the
same cognitive significance at the heart of admissions with
LIST OF STATUTES BREACHED:
1 Fraud Act 2006, c35. 4 sections 2,3,4,12, all
admitted, proven, corroborated.
NOT one controverted! From
July to Dec 2012, at least
ONE HUNDRED & FIFTY (150) breaches in 4
sections; just a partial
Theft Act 1968, c60. S 18,19,20,21.
rough estimate 5 times directly; 2 times indirectly.
from Harassment Act 1997, c40.
well into 8 times, under the cloak of disparate & cognitive
continuity of staff.
Perjury Act 1911, s5.
as for Fraud Act 150 utterances not disputed, all admitted.
Misrepresentation Act 1967, c7.
to for Fraud Act.
Malicious Communications Act 1988, c27
Data Protection Act 1998, c29,
well into 8 breaches, section 10, purposes et al., more tba.
Consumer Credit Act 2006, c14, as amended 1974, several
improperly executed or not at all: OR
Bills of Exchange Act 1882,c61, s23
Pre-action protocol, and CPR, thus far, antonymous to any moral
or truth; better described thus far as a perjurous farce.
have a proud
that mean you
proud, or his-story
Is the above your
them with the best service we
the lowest possible by comparison...
Jan 2012 – German-owned Npower
came out worst
of the big six,
with only 41 per cent of ..'
2 WINTER V NPOWER DRAFT
not proof read Page
36 of 148
this in PDF format
All communications will be
stored, and remain on file UNTIL
these matters are addressed.
*** FORMAL NOTICE *** 1
*** IMPORTANT for YOU *** 1
*** PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL, *** 1
* FRAUD ACT 2006 * ' Responsible business practice is critical
to our success as a company?' 2
02/04/12 06:44:33 PM used as my reference. NOTICE: PRE-ACTION
PROTOCOL & CPR. 15
Duty of the parties 15
The parties are required to help the court to further the
overriding objective. 15
2.Fraud by false representation – See list beginning here.
Tacitly admitted. 15
3.Fraud by failing to disclose information – See list
beginning here. Admitted by Breach. 15
4.Fraud by abuse of position – See list beginning 15
12.Liability of company officers for offences by company. –
See list beginning 15
The Tort of GROSS negligence: culpa lata dolo aequiparatur –
EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE? 15
Misrepresentations Act 1967. s2. 15
Perjury Act 1911, s5. 15
*** FORMAL NOTICE *** - CEO. Sent 7th Aug. 28
Moving matters forward: as of 7th August 2012 incl: Mr V.
Here is your starting 'position letter'. 31
Here is your starting 'position letter'. Yet again, as you over
looked it. 34
FRAUD ACT s12: PROVED, disclosed, admitted: CEO committed,
consented connived. 35
TWO FOLD EVIDENCE saved for public expose. 35
Your very own Lingua lapsa verum dicit accompanied with your own
where you could not possibly know unless – see here. 35
On P16 L18, was a part quote, look it up: the remainder shows
the obvious long ago. 35
19 + more coming – Specific ADMIT Questions unanswered in Pre
Action Protocol – 16.5 (5) 39
12 + 12 more coming – Failures to DISCLOSE CONTRARY to Fraud
Act s3 39
so far – FORTY NINE breaches of the Fraud Act alone. 40
A few highlights that disclose directing mind's commitment to
their mission in PR. 43
Sharon Harvey: directing minds overlooking with unashamed
Kevin Scott's discloses anachronic problems, with
Blank for continuation of the NOTICES TO ADMIT, DISCLOSE, FA
UNDER pre-action protocol, SECTION III, having received NOTICE
of court procedure. 52
ALL ALLEGATIONS here – only 35% so far – ARE taken as
Proof of ABUSE of Position, and TACIT connivance – your docs –
FA s4,12. 56
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE: in Qdx: 'QC' – 'DA' , for later exposure
& proofs. 58
Due to your unambiguous and abysmal failure in CPR 16.5, the
court rules provide that: 58
CPR 16.5: YOU HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ADMIT each / every allegation,
see here. 58
YOU have made two statements in contrariety, rebutting your
entire empty procedure. 58
I suggest you do NOT confer upon me any impediment or detriment
I shall IMMEDIATELY apply for an INJUNCTION to cease, desist
WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICES, I shall ISSUE PROCEEDINGS at my
discretion OR 58
Here disclosed the 1st & 2nd escrow sum of 2 * £96: to be
collected before an upright judge. 59
Payment held by YOUR CAUSE – team unable to 'gain an
understanding' of simple request. 59
Following FULL AWARENESS of Mr. V. Becker, fraudulent
representations continue. 59
Exhibit 5. 48 false representations and 1 clear contradiction,
obvious seeming amnesia. 60
Exhibit 6a. 46DP: false representations and 1 clear own goal, in
seeming amnesia. 61
By full awareness Mr. V. Becker: unambiguously & wilfully
silent, contrary to CPR 62
29 initial NOTICES – many more added currently 43– to ADMIT
and DISCLOSE 62
Exhibit 6R. Npower's Kevin Scott discloses anachronic problems.
Np-Restricted until end of business day 17th inst, thereafter
disclosed wider...reason here 63
By full awareness Mr. V. Becker: unambiguously & wilfully is
silent, contrary to CPR 63
UNLESS Mr. V.Beckers and or Ms J. Jaglowsci DO – below, then
they take responsibility... 64
DOCUMENTS to be verified by a statement of truth by Messrs J.
Jaglowsi & V. Beckers. 64
You are invited: in simple SVO language sans periphrastic, to
email me a withdrawal letter by 65
** NON-NEGOTIABLE ** 67
Your - 'our proposals to resolve this matter are reasonable'
PROVES your empty review 72
The 'review; query, complaint' each; I never requested or made;
proof HOW you converted it. 73
Incontrovertible evidence: denial impossible, even by shifting
and hedging. 73
Exhibit 7. 6 false representations and 1 clear contradiction,
obvious seeming amnesia. 77
Exhibit 8. 6 false representations and 1 clear contradiction,
obvious seeming amnesia. 78
Your style! 'BALANCE brought forward' £1750 *2 you owe me –
looked over & overlooked. 79
Exhibit 9. 2+ more false representations, 1 ignoratio, and 1
obtuse conditional statement. 81
Exhibit 9R. Sharon Harvey: directing minds overlooking with
unashamed audacity. 82
Exhibit 10. 4+ more false and misleading representations. ABUSE
of position FA s4. 85
Exhibit 11. ambiguous references to be determined. 86
The 'Executives will be in touch with you to address the points'
raised … letter. 86
Exhibit 12. the 4th letter – final = 'leaving nothing to be
looked for or expected' Look it up! 90
10 DP's: 1 misleading, 2 false representations & 4
con-textual circumlocutions. 91
Here is your starting 'position letter'. Yet again, as you over
looked it. 91
Ex 13 discloses full consent & connivance of V. Beckers &
J. Jaglowski. FA s2,3,4,12. 95
Ex 14 discloses intended breach: Theft Act s17,18 21, proved &
admitted Fraud s2,3,4,12. 95
“FAT cat energy firms will be forced to pay compensation to
every customer they rip off” 96
On Thursday, 25 October 2012, 6:14, I received this from you. 97
CLAIM or COUNTER-CLAIM for the court. (Draft) 102
Particulars of Claim – Level 1 – Lines . 104
Particulars of Claim – Level 2 – Paragraphs. 104
Additional pages brought forward from BUNDLE 1. January 2012 108
PROOF that the DIRECTOR, and CEO were FULLY AWARE, contrary to
FA. S4, s12. 109
40 PAGES EVIDENCE: from your OWN con-text, and additional
grounds from Mr. Winter. 109
The evidence that contradicts all communications from Npower,
proving fraud – estoppel. 110
REVOCATION NOTICE of licence under common law for visit, without
warrant & consent. 112
Incontrovertible exhibit evidence: denial impossible, even by
shifting and hedging. 112
BE CERTAIN of compliance: Rights of Entry (Gas and Electricity
Boards) Act 1954: s2. 1 116
BE CERTAIN of compliance – Schedule 6 of the Electricity Act
1989 (3) 116
YOU caused detriment to my disabilities, medical results Feb:
Damages move to unlimited. 116
Make CERTAIN I receive the 14 day Human Rights Act notice –
Be CERTAIN warrant application DISCLOSES dispute, & NON-PMT
by YOUR CAUSE. 117
Make CERTAIN you present full particulars of claim with
substantive BILL & audit trail. 117
Estoppel by your very own representation: check Halsbury which
you 'should' know. 117
REMINDER, like you, 'BALANCE BROUGHT FORWARD' you owe me
£3772.55 +. 117
Your wilful obstruction to switch-over increases our costs,
augmenting your blackmail. 117
You have harassed increasingly, for a month now, and this grows
with it. 117
Profiling the mens rea with objects of thought. 119
Profiling the mens rea with objects of factual performances. 119
Profiling the mens rea with objects of law. 120
Prominent most significant attributes and properties that
classify the above: 120
Factors indicating higher culpability 127
Factors indicating significantly lower culpability 127
Factors indicating a more than usually serious degree of harm
Repudiation of Contract 128
Come and explore our World of Bright ideas. [NO facts please]
Your npower Query 146
implied contract 148
implied-in-fact contract 148
implied-in-law contract 148
More to come.
THIS is your starting
Look it ALL over
without over looking any part. Partial
list of statutory breaches you have committed. NOTHING
moves forward, UNTIL these are answered (Y/N)
Mandatory Notices to Admit,
and requests to DISCLOSE ALL breached in statutes and CPR.
+ more coming – Specific ADMIT Questions unanswered
in Pre Action Protocol – 16.5 (5)
Q1. ADMIT 'Account balance before charges '£871.57 is a FALSE
Representation s2, (Y/N) 12
Q2. ADMIT Account balance before charges '£871.57 Failure to
Disclose – Breach of s3 (Y/N). 12
Q3. ADMIT '...tel...number...no longer seems to work'. is a
False Representation (Y/N). 12
Q4. ADMIT the above Representation is FALSE (Y/N) or produce as
stated just above. 11
Q5. ADMIT you have not yet apologised, and you mislead to say
otherwise (Y/N). 11
Q6 ADMIT your failure to reply or disclose within your stated
time at least five times. (y/n)? 10
Q7. ADMIT you FAILED to disclose that bill, namely P22. 1.(a-d)
detailed here yet again, 23
Q9. ADMIT such a documented agreement – does NOT exist 24
Q9a.ADMIT that 'would like...[ x ] wrote off ' is a false
representation: because 24
QA. ADMIT – CEO, that nobody performed my 'IMMEDIATE' request
on para 4 above (Y/N)? 28
QB. ADMIT – CEO, that 'IMMEDIATE' performance occurred and you
ignored it (Y/N)? 28
QC. ADMIT that QC is a false representation – converted by
indirect narration or 58
QD. ADMIT that your 'response' to my letter to your CEO, IS with
his consent – FA2006 s12. 35
QE. ADMIT CEO! Your handing my email to D. Bailey, breaches s12:
consent & connivance. 35
QF. ADMITTED, and proved by yourself, YOUR CEO has committed the
QG. ADMITTED, and proved by yourself, YOU have breached section
4, abuse of position. 72
QH. ADMIT - I, Ms Julie. Jaglowski, do swear that all Npower
QI. ADMIT - I, Mr. Volker. Beckers, do swear that all Npower
QV. ADMIT, that Ex5, contains NO 'proposal' whatever? Or goto DE
QW. ADMIT, it is impossible to predicate 'reasonable' of a
non-entity? Or goto DF 72
see below here
More to come.
+ 12 more coming – Failures to
DISCLOSE CONTRARY to Fraud Act s3
D1. DISCLOSE a copy of any document from myself, discussing with
anyone my happiness. 11
D2. DISCLOSE the true copy of the document on which your …
BALANCE.. relies. 12
D5. DISCLOSE date of document issue: WHY were we not shown it at
that time? 12
D3. DISCLOSE – Jeanette Cook -- a true copy of your call log
to this number. 12
D4. DISCLOSE – Jane Ferguson p 21 para 6 – a true copy of
your call log to this number. 12
D6. DISCLOSE – Carol Allison – a true copy of your call log
to this number. 12
D7. DISCLOSE any true copy of an original agreement between us.
D8. DISCLOSE such agreement where anyone here stated they will
pay for your negligence. 23
D9. DISCLOSE the text, or recording where I stated 'would
like...be wrote [sic] off 24
DA. DISCLOSE the true copy of the document DA, its audit trail,
& DATE it was MADE UP. 58
DC. DISCLOSED, and proved by yourself, YOUR CEO has committed
the offence. 72
DD. DISCLOSED, and proved by yourself, YOU have breached section
4, abuse of position. 72
DE. DISCLOSE where in exh5 there is another term 'proposal'. 72
DF. DISCLOSE how you attribute something to or about nothing. 72
course here are the 14 MORE ADMISSIONS
you to ADMIT Failures
to disclose. SINCE
EACH item D1-DF+, thus for each item QJ-QU
– your 'failure to disclose',
BREACH of Fraud Act s3, Perjury Act s5, et al,
in pre-action protocol else all
unambiguously 'TAKEN AS ADMITTED'
CPR 16.5 (5)
grand PART total of (well over 100)
so far – FORTY NINE breaches
of the Fraud Act alone.
Return to QU index.
you assign or pass on any alleged debt without this full
DEALING WITH THE ALLEGATIONS AND ADMIT & DISCLOSE, Qdx
WILLINGLY AGREE TO PAY ME a further £5000 IN DAMAGES,
adding new conspirators and interlopers to your fraud,
unwittingly for them, to continue the seeming
unawareness where awareness is both traceable and already proved
at board level; hence you commit a further multitude of false
representations to them, and make them co-conspirators.
I have neither dealt with other acts nor the remainder of such a
plenitude where 1 document alone has at least 46
disparate predications – BUT
could be easier for any person without requisite mens
– with it; – requisite mens rea – hides behind
silence to evade culpability,
continues conferring loss Ex
the Fraud Act s2,3,4,12; Theft Act 1968 s21 – Blackmail
demand with menaces...';
due to your menaces being based on your subsequent acts and
wilful omissions with behavioural aspects in conformity with J.
Bentham's principle of utility, and another critical
of which it is too difficult for you to manifest awareness; to be
advised in public.
item above stated, taking responsibility for your false
denying them – with
full documentation / corroboration on what their truth relies.
document sets out the terms and conditions of our
agreement as it unfolded by performance – your choices made
knowingly without controverting the defaulted outcome.
course you may make a serious
to settle amicably – as you stated unmeaning-fully
and due allowances for your controverting having fully
Following the FORMAL NOTICE received by
Mr. V. Beckers on 7th Inst
I now am satisfied that Both Mr. Beckers – CEO – and Ms
Jaglowski – Director – are responsible jointly and separately
[as directing minds] in consent and connivance to commit Fraud:
Language of fraud, false
representations & misrepresentations.
Npower – energy
suppliers – Fraud.
Did NPOWER, approach you early this year, January 2012,
'advising' you they had made
– Note just the ONE
and that, as 'time unfolds what plighted cunning hides',
from that single error dating back
FIVE YEARS, YOU
owed them a debt
of £3800 or thereabout?
Keeping silent of course, on the little matter that you
never entered into a contract with them, to indemnify them for
their error – Properly
labelled – incompetence
the extreme, combined with gross
to be made responsible.–
all manufactured from that minuscule error.
Did you request them to DISCLOSE – under the
Fraud Act s3 – the existence of such a CONTRACT?
Worse still, did they in their self-esteem and moral integrity,
'advise' you that all
was a 'rebuttable presumption' and fable that no such contract
existed or did they simply contract such an unthinkably
honest expression to a behavioural moment of silence?
Perhaps they should have asked you if you 'would care to take a
spin with their PR spinsters or better – semantic
Did they then
proceed to 'advise' you they would conduct a
review, you never
requested, on a query
you never made, over looking a complaint
you never made. Yes they managed all that in their circumlocution
exercise on an 'issue' that pointed to the void,
they were going to avoid serially, until they manufacture
what they described as a 'final
Npower say to you, when you exercise your absolute right to leave
with what they say about themselves,
they say to you, when they want to take you on – sorry in. Note the
language when you leave, I shall let it to you decide what your call
this, since it is “too bad for bad report.”
Here it is
with my reply.
AND: directing minds
overlooking with unashamed audacity – a
euphemism for the true attributes of their language.
on their Director and CEO of course.
Ref: From Exhibit 9.
the utmost respect and courtesy.
Ms. S. H.
have received your recent letter, of which two
items: among many,
know that you've
into a gas contract with another and want to stay with us, we'll do
everything we can to keep you......'
Brief, more detail next page: here is a parallel con-struction
which applies to all those whose thought forms identify with yours &
know that you've
into an employment contract with
to help you......'
are places specialising
Npower Exhibit 1
Npower Exhibit 2
Npower Exhibit 3
Npower Exhibit 5
Npower Exhibit 6
Npower Exhibit 7
Npower Exhibit 8
Npower Exhibit 9
Npower Exhibit 10
Npower Exhibit 11
Npower Exhibit 12
Npower Exhibit 13
Npower Exhibit 14
Npower Exhibit 15
Npower Exhibit 16
Npower Exhibit 17
Npower Exhibit 18
Npower Exhibit 19
Npower Exhibit 20
Npower Exhibit 21
Npower Exhibit 22
Npower Exhibit 23
Npower Exhibit 24
Npower Exhibit 25
Npower Exhibit 26
Npower Exhibit 27
Npower Exhibit 28
Npower Exhibit 29
Npower Exhibit 30
Npower Exhibit 31
Npower Exhibit 32
Npower Exhibit 33
Npower Exhibit 34
Npower Exhibit 35
Npower Exhibit 36
False wrapped in truths
ISABELLA. O gracious
Harp not on that; nor
do not banish reason
For inequality; but let
your reason serve
To make the truth
appear where it seems hid,
And hide the false
& brokers –
Look at these bays and lines, they
are all non complaint.
false aim; move the still-piecing air,
speak'st it falsely, as I love mine
story, then, goes false you threw it him
been false to Fulvia? Riotous madness,
O most false love!
Where have you this? 'Tis false.
armourer of my heart. false, false;
false soul of Egypt! this grave charm-
cards with Caesar, and false-play'd my
false huswife Fortune break her wheel,
false blood, thou register of lies,
falseness in a pride of truth.
false jewel, and his amorous spoil.
false fire which in his cheek so glowed,
of false-fac'd soothing. When steel
this so dishonour'd rub, laid falsely
to my nature? Rather say I play
and yet my mind gave me his clothes made a false
your edges on me. 'Boy'! false hound!
most false effect; and I the truer
So to be
false with her.
father cruel and a step-dame false;
with hourly falsehood- falsehood
your taking of a false report, which
rangers false themselves, yield up
through a casement to allure false
false with them.
into thy ear! What false Italian-
two villains, whose false oaths
false to his bed? What is it to be
myself awake? That's false to's bed,
false! Thy conscience witness! Iachimo,
true honest men being heard, like false
his time, thought false; and Sinon's
gallant shall be false and perjur'd
false teachers; though those that are
false struck, can take no greater wound,
prove false, which I will never be,
than to lie for need; and falsehood
one o' th' false ones. Now I think on
false. Soft, ho! what trunk is here
am false I am honest; not true,
to be true.
truth from falsehood. On, speak to him.
my heart drops blood and my false
falsehood and corruption doth it shame.
my false hand cut the wedding-ring,
For if we
two be one, and thou play false,
your false love with some show of
secret-false. What need she be
Dissembling villain, thou speak'st false
OF EPHESUS. Dissembling harlot, thou art false
these nails I'll pluck out these false
is false thou dost report to us.
As this is
false he burdens me withal!
is false you burden me withal.
not then be false to any man.
of falsehood takes this carp of truth;
falsely borne in hand, sends out arrests
frighted with false fire?
as dicers' oaths. O, such a deed
cheerfully on the false trail they cry!
O, this is
counter, you false Danish dogs!
wheel becomes it! It is the false
steward, that stole his
the ears of men with false reports.
smooth comforts false, worse than true
wrenching the true cause the false
way. It is not a
Northumberland, then false to him,
that seed grow to a greater falseness;
slight and false-derived cause,
As a false
favourite doth his prince's name,
your spiteful false objections,
matter. God is my witness, I am falsely
accus'd by the
fiend, avoid! Thunder and lightning. Exit SPIRIT
and impious Beaufort, that false priest,
accuse doth level at my life.
not want false witness to condemn me
allegations to o'erthrow his state?
the winners, for they play'd me false!
my fear were false! ah, that it were!
I prov'd thee false or fear'd thy faith.
return we to the false Duke Humphrey.
Am I not
witch'd like her? Or thou not false like
suspect be false, forgive me, God;
What dares not Warwick, if false Suffolk
false murd'rous coward, on thy knee
fell serpents as false Suffolk is;
revolting Normans thorough thee
STAFFORD. That's false.
false caterpillars and intend their
king, why hast thou broken faith with me,
I am thy
king, and thou a false-heart traitor.
the power of Warwick, that false
thee, fell Clifford, and thee, false
false woman as this king by thee.
buckler falsehood with a pedigree?
conveyance and thy lord's false love;
false Edward, thy supposed king,
cross the seas and bid false Edward
false Edward, the supposed king,
betray'd by falsehood of his guard
Thou judgest false already. I mean, thou
shalt have the
false thief; for the poor abuses of the
rather let me have it, as you are a false
'Sblood, my lord, they are false! Nay,
I'll tickle ye for a
and I thine, most truly falsely, must
needs be granted to
HENRY. Now, fie upon my false French! By
mine honour, in true
will I trust if she prove false. Exeunt
Nor any of
his false confederates.
report is fabulous and false.false,
print the allegation and PR replie without
a rebuttal. Four comments were put to Evening standard NONE put
How Camden HIDES TRUTH......in economic economic PR
statements for gain.
Their spokesman and --- SPOKES. Emphasis added.
A spokesman for Camden council said: "We are confident we
have acted lawfully. The power
to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the Road
Traffic Regulations Act 1984. Therefore the changes
brought about by the Traffic Management Act 2004, which deal with
the enforcement of parking contraventions, do not affect the
validity of our existing Traffic Management
Constructing what LOOKS like a
syllogism, HOW to tell a seeming truth while HIDING a LIE....
Questions not answered or specified,
1."We are confident we have acted lawfully. ---- WHEN,
during which period of relevancy? Note the choice of preterite
tense. It may be that they have acted ... but it is not that they
are acting during the relevant period of time.. ( suppresio veri
suggesti falsi, law dictionary means Fraud see here, and the
meaning of false representations in the fraud act, sections 1-4
even if it is misleading.)
2.The power to make Traffic Management Orders is conferred by the
Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984.----- SO
WHAT? HAVE THEY EXERCISED that POWER LAWFULLY during the relevant
3.Therefore ..... (Based on TWO
hypothetical premisses, undetermined as to TRUTH, we make a
conclusion that MAY be true or false, BUT is irrelevant anyway..)
a)......................the changes brought about by the Traffic
Management Act 2004, which deal with the enforcement of parking
contraventions, do not affect the validity of our existing
Traffic Management Orders." ( Which
existing TMO's AND or TRO's? The ONE or TWO that MAY have been
compliant, or the HUNDREDS that are NOT?..... They may still be
still 'valid' in that they have been made correctly. However,
they are not 'in force' because there are no powers to issue PCNs
until the provision ie. under the 1991 Road Traffic Act ... is
amended or varied to the TMA 2004 and Penalty Charge Notices
issued by Parking Attendants is amended to PCNs issued by CEOs )
This is an amalgam of fallacies. First fallacy species of
'petitio principii', the proposition to be proved is assumed
implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises; Namely the
conclusion is based on an ASSUMPTION that is undetermined and IS
the issue to be PROVED. THE TMA changes ARE MANDATORY.... Other
internal fallacies, Fallacy species of 'ignoratio elenchi' ; (
presenting an argument that may in itself be valid, but doesn't
address the issue in question) then choosing and using qualifiers
that are irrelevant and ignoring ones that are. The Swapping out
a relevant term(s) for an irrelevant one, We are NOT concerned
with the validity of paperwork we are concerned with it's LEGAL
ENFORCEABILITY. There are MANY more here. ONLY for the
specialist. For the average reader this is probably already too
much. This conscious swapping is 'mens rea' to the depostion in
writing and is profiled by the agenda of target driven revenue in
the newly so called, 'baseline performance indicators'. It is the
art or economic and economic truth, heralded in when New labour
called in advertising pr agencies to promote its policies in the
Logic Laws fallacies at Force
of Destiny. Here
and more on Camden's
nice 'representations. Fallacies of independence click on top
choices P1, P2 here.
Use Neil's site and get your appeal in. NOT to save just £50-60
but to Send a message to so called 'authorities' that they are
COUNCILS, and public SERVANTS with a duty to act lawfully. Go
to top, and click on parking appeal banners.
The period of concern is 31st March to 18th
The legality of the Tro, and Tmo (Traffic Regulation / Management
Orders ) is related to changes that have to be made to references
that must refer to the TMA 2004, and NO LONGER to the RTA 1991.
If you make an appeal.
Go here, briefly look at pictures of Camden's
NON compliant bay lines, then click to Neil Heron's Parking
Appeal's website and subscribe for details of how to challenge
the PCN. It would be remarkable of PATAS, to dismisses an appeal
on grounds put in the way provided by parking appeals, and we
shall all be watching over the shoulder at PATAS to observe what
they do, and HOW they reason, just like Camden.
Suppressio veri suggestio falsi is Latin for suppression of the
truth is the suggestion of falsehood. IT has manifest and
remarkable aspect of FRAUD. Look below...
SUPPRESSIO VERI - Concealment of truth.
In general a suppression of the truth, when a party is
bound to disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract
of insurance a knowledge of the facts is required to enable the
underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of
the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any other, the
parties are required to represent every thing with fairness.
Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi is a ground to rescind
an agreement, or at least not to carry it into execution.
SUGGESTIO FALSI. A statement of a falsehood. This amounts to a
fraud whenever the party making it was bound to disclose the
truth. (WHOLE TRUTH THAT IS) whenever the party making it was
bound to disclose the truth. 2. The following is an example of a
case where chancery will interfere 2. The following is an example
of a case where chancery will interfere and. set aside a contract
as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: and. set aside
a contract as fraudulent, on account of the suggestio falsi: a
purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild land,
and a purchaser applied to the seller to purchase a lot of wild
land, and represented to him it was worth nothing, except for a
sheep pasture, when he represented to him it was worth nothing,
except for a sheep pasture, when he knew there was a valuable
mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. knew there was
a valuable mine on the lot, of which the seller was ignorant. The
sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837, et seq.
Vide The sale was set aside. 2 Paige, 390; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3837,
et seq. Vide Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation;
Suppressio veri. Concealment; Misrepresentation; Representation;
SUPPRESSIO VERI. Concealment of truth. 2. In general a
suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to 2. In general
a suppression of the truth, when a party is bound to disclose it,
vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a knowledge
disclose it, vitiates a contract. In the contract of insurance a
knowledge of the facts is required to enable the underwriter to
calculate the chances of the facts is required to enable the
underwriter to calculate the chances and form a due estimate of
the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than and form a due
estimate of the risk; and, in this contract perhaps more than any
other, the parties are required to represent every thing with
fairness. any other, the parties are required to represent every
thing with fairness. 1 Bla. Rep. 594; 3 Burr. 1809. 1 Bla. Rep.
594; 3 Burr. 1809. 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio falsi
is a ground to rescind an 3. Suppressio veri as well as suggestio
falsi is a ground to rescind an agreement, or at least not to
carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. agreement, or at
least not to carry it into execution. 3 Atk. 383; Prec. Ch. 138;
1 Fonb. Eq. c. 2, s. 8; 1 Ball